CEPH filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
To: Samuel Just <sam.just@inktank.com>
Cc: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Subject: Re: automatic repair of inconsistent pg?
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:59:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50E17E0B.805@profihost.ag> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+4uBUb81Gv-4vjKTd8UvV7V8Ep7PG3roug30+0e9hHksTc35g@mail.gmail.com>

Am 31.12.2012 02:10, schrieb Samuel Just:
> Are you using xfs?  If so, what mount options?

Yes,
noatime,nodiratime,nobarrier,logbufs=8,logbsize=256k

Stefan

>
> On Dec 30, 2012 1:28 PM, "Stefan Priebe" <s.priebe@profihost.ag
> <mailto:s.priebe@profihost.ag>> wrote:
>  >
>  > Am 30.12.2012 19:17, schrieb Samuel Just:
>  >>
>  >> This is somewhat more likely to have been a bug in the replication logic
>  >> (there were a few fixed between 0.53 and 0.55).  Had there been any
>  >> recent osd failures?
>  >
>  > Yes i was stressing CEPH with failures (power, link, disk, ...).
>  >
>  > Stefan
>  >
>  >> On Dec 24, 2012 10:55 PM, "Sage Weil" <sage@inktank.com
> <mailto:sage@inktank.com>
>  >> <mailto:sage@inktank.com <mailto:sage@inktank.com>>> wrote:
>  >>
>  >>     On Tue, 25 Dec 2012, Stefan Priebe wrote:
>  >>      > Hello list,
>  >>      >
>  >>      > today i got the following ceph status output:
>  >>      > 2012-12-25 02:57:00.632945 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v1394388: 7632
> pgs: 7631
>  >>      > active+clean, 1 active+clean+inconsistent; 151 GB data, 307 GB
>  >>     used, 5028 GB /
>  >>      > 5336 GB avail
>  >>      >
>  >>      >
>  >>      > i then grepped the inconsistent pg by:
>  >>      > # ceph pg dump - | grep inconsistent
>  >>      > 3.ccf   10      0       0       0       41037824        155930
>  >>       155930
>  >>      > active+clean+inconsistent       2012-12-25 01:51:35.318459
> 6243'2107
>  >>      > 6190'9847       [14,42] [14,42] 6243'2107       2012-12-25
>  >>     01:51:35.318436
>  >>      > 6007'2074       2012-12-23 01:51:24.386366
>  >>      >
>  >>      > and initiated a repair:
>  >>      > #  ceph pg repair 3.ccf
>  >>      > instructing pg 3.ccf on osd.14 to repair
>  >>      >
>  >>      > The log output then was:
>  >>      > 2012-12-25 02:56:59.056382 osd.14 [ERR] 3.ccf osd.42 missing
>  >>      > 1c602ccf/rbd_data.4904d6b8b4567.0000000000000b84/head//3
>  >>      > 2012-12-25 02:56:59.056385 osd.14 [ERR] 3.ccf osd.42 missing
>  >>      > ceb55ccf/rbd_data.48cc66b8b4567.0000000000001538/head//3
>  >>      > 2012-12-25 02:56:59.097989 osd.14 [ERR] 3.ccf osd.42 missing
>  >>      > dba6bccf/rbd_data.4797d6b8b4567.00000000000015ad/head//3
>  >>      > 2012-12-25 02:56:59.097991 osd.14 [ERR] 3.ccf osd.42 missing
>  >>      > a4deccf/rbd_data.45f956b8b4567.00000000000003d5/head//3
>  >>      > 2012-12-25 02:56:59.098022 osd.14 [ERR] 3.ccf repair 4 missing, 0
>  >>     inconsistent
>  >>      > objects
>  >>      > 2012-12-25 02:56:59.098046 osd.14 [ERR] 3.ccf repair 4 errors, 4
>  >>     fixed
>  >>      >
>  >>      > Why doesn't ceph repair this automatically? Ho could this happen
>  >>     at all?
>  >>
>  >>     We just made some fixes to repair in next (it was broken sometime
>  >>     between
>  >>     ~0.53 and 0.55).  The latest next should repair it.  In general
> we don't
>  >>     repair automatically lest we inadvertantly propagate bad data or
> paper
>  >>     over a bug.
>  >>
>  >>     As for the original source of the missing objects... I'm not sure.
>  >>       There
>  >>     were some fixed races related to backfill that could lead to an
> object
>  >>     being missed, but Sam would know more about how likely that
> actually is.
>  >>
>  >>     sage
>  >>     --
>  >>     To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> ceph-devel" in
>  >>     the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> <mailto:majordomo@vger.kernel.org>
>  >>     <mailto:majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> <mailto:majordomo@vger.kernel.org>>
>  >>     More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>  >>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-12-31 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-25  2:01 automatic repair of inconsistent pg? Stefan Priebe
2012-12-25  6:54 ` Sage Weil
2012-12-30 18:22   ` Samuel Just
     [not found]   ` <CA+4uBUbDVC0pKEfGfHmEuaVvZsoHWyZrxoE+vrFSddgWLGeELQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-12-30 19:28     ` Stefan Priebe
     [not found]       ` <CA+4uBUb81Gv-4vjKTd8UvV7V8Ep7PG3roug30+0e9hHksTc35g@mail.gmail.com>
2012-12-31 11:59         ` Stefan Priebe [this message]
2012-12-31 19:21           ` Samuel Just
2013-01-01 20:12             ` Stefan Priebe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50E17E0B.805@profihost.ag \
    --to=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sage@inktank.com \
    --cc=sam.just@inktank.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox