From: Wido den Hollander <wido@widodh.nl>
To: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Cc: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "hit suicide timeout" message after upgrade to 0.56
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:50:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50E5EF2C.2070502@widodh.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1301030851150.5264@cobra.newdream.net>
Hi,
On 01/03/2013 05:52 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> Hi Wido,
>
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2013, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I updated my 10 node 40 OSD cluster from 0.48 to 0.56 yesterday evening and
>> found out this morning that I had 23 OSDs still up and in.
>>
>> Investigating some logs I found these messages:
>
> This sounds quite a bit #3714. You might give wip-3714 a try...
>
I'll give it a try and see if I can reproduce. Probably just have to
kill the whole cluster and restart everything to see if it behaves the
same way.
I'll give it a try and let you know.
Wido
> sage
>
>
>>
>> *********************************************************************
>> -8> 2013-01-02 21:13:40.528936 7f9eb177a700 1 heartbeat_map is_healthy
>> 'OSD::op_tp thread 0x7f9ea2f5d700' had timed out after 30
>> -7> 2013-01-02 21:13:40.528985 7f9eb177a700 1 heartbeat_map is_healthy
>> 'OSD::op_tp thread 0x7f9ea375e700' had timed out after 30
>> -6> 2013-01-02 21:13:41.311088 7f9eaff77700 10 monclient:
>> _send_mon_message to mon.pri at [2a00:f10:11b:cef0:230:48ff:fed3:b086]:6789/0
>> -5> 2013-01-02 21:13:45.047220 7f9e92282700 0 --
>> [2a00:f10:11b:cef0:225:90ff:fe32:cf64]:0/2882 >>
>> [2a00:f10:11b:cef0:225:90ff:fe33:49fe]:6805/2373 pipe(0x9d7ad80 sd=135 :0
>> pgs=0 cs=0 l=1).fault
>> -4> 2013-01-02 21:13:45.049225 7f9e962c2700 0 --
>> [2a00:f10:11b:cef0:225:90ff:fe32:cf64]:6801/2882 >>
>> [2a00:f10:11b:cef0:225:90ff:fe33:49fe]:6804/2373 pipe(0x9d99000 sd=104 :44363
>> pgs=99 cs=1 l=0).fault with nothing to send, going to standby
>> -3> 2013-01-02 21:13:45.529075 7f9eb177a700 1 heartbeat_map is_healthy
>> 'OSD::op_tp thread 0x7f9ea2f5d700' had timed out after 30
>> -2> 2013-01-02 21:13:45.529115 7f9eb177a700 1 heartbeat_map is_healthy
>> 'OSD::op_tp thread 0x7f9ea2f5d700' had suicide timed out after 300
>> -1> 2013-01-02 21:13:45.531952 7f9eb177a700 -1 common/HeartbeatMap.cc: In
>> function 'bool ceph::HeartbeatMap::_check(ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*, const
>> char*, time_t)' thread 7f9eb177a700 time 2013-01-02 21:13:45.529176
>> common/HeartbeatMap.cc: 78: FAILED assert(0 == "hit suicide timeout")
>>
>> ceph version 0.56 (1a32f0a0b42f169a7b55ed48ec3208f6d4edc1e8)
>> 1: (ceph::HeartbeatMap::_check(ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*, char const*,
>> long)+0x107) [0x796877]
>> 2: (ceph::HeartbeatMap::is_healthy()+0x87) [0x797207]
>> 3: (ceph::HeartbeatMap::check_touch_file()+0x23) [0x797453]
>> 4: (CephContextServiceThread::entry()+0x55) [0x8338d5]
>> 5: (()+0x7e9a) [0x7f9eb4571e9a]
>> 6: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7f9eb2ff5cbd]
>> NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is needed to
>> interpret this.
>>
>> 0> 2013-01-02 21:13:46.314478 7f9eaff77700 10 monclient:
>> _send_mon_message to mon.pri at [2a00:f10:11b:cef0:230:48ff:fed3:b086]:6789/0
>> *********************************************************************
>>
>> Reading these messages I'm trying to figure out why those messages came along.
>>
>> Am I understanding this correctly that the heartbeat updates didn't come along
>> in time and the OSDs committed suicide?
>>
>> I read the code in common/HeartbeatMap.cc and it seems like that.
>>
>> During the restart of the cluster the Atom CPUs were very busy, so could it be
>> that the CPUs were just to busy and the OSDs weren't responding to heartbeats
>> in time?
>>
>> In total 16 of the 17 crashed OSDs are down with these log messages.
>>
>> I'm now starting the 16 crashed OSDs one by one and that seems to go just
>> fine.
>>
>> I've set "osd recovery max active = 1" to prevent overloading the CPUs to much
>> since I know Atoms are not that powerful. I'm just still trying to get it all
>> working on them :)
>>
>> Am I right this is probably a lack of CPU power during the heavy recovery
>> which causes them to not respond to heartbeat updates in time?
>>
>> Wido
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-03 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-03 12:26 "hit suicide timeout" message after upgrade to 0.56 Wido den Hollander
2013-01-03 16:52 ` Sage Weil
2013-01-03 20:50 ` Wido den Hollander [this message]
2013-01-03 21:05 ` Sage Weil
2013-01-03 21:10 ` Wido den Hollander
2013-01-08 17:35 ` Gregory Farnum
2013-01-08 21:36 ` Sage Weil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50E5EF2C.2070502@widodh.nl \
--to=wido@widodh.nl \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sage@inktank.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox