From: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
To: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Cc: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST 0/4] rbd: explicitly support only one osd op
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:27:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F761A5.6010702@inktank.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50E6EA94.1040001@inktank.com>
On 01/04/2013 06:43 AM, Alex Elder wrote:
> An osd request can be made up of multiple "ops", all of which are
> completed (or not) transactionally. There is partial support for
> multiple ops in an rbd request in the rbd code, but it's incomplete
> and not even supported by the osd client or the messenger right now.
>
> I see three problems with this partial implementation: it gives a
> false impression of how things work; it complicates some code in
> some cases where it's not necessary; and it may constrain how one
> might pursue fully implementing multiple ops in a request to ways
> that don't fit well with how we want to do things.
>
> So this series just simplifies things, making it explicit that there
> is only one op in an kernel osd client request right now.
>
> -Alex
>
> [PATCH REPOST 1/4] rbd: pass num_op with ops array
> [PATCH REPOST 2/4] libceph: pass num_op with ops
> [PATCH REPOST 3/4] rbd: there is really only one op
> [PATCH REPOST 4/4] rbd: assume single op in a request
These look good.
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-17 2:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-04 14:43 [PATCH REPOST 0/4] rbd: explicitly support only one osd op Alex Elder
2013-01-04 14:45 ` [PATCH REPOST 1/4] rbd: pass num_op with ops array Alex Elder
2013-01-04 14:45 ` [PATCH REPOST 2/4] libceph: pass num_op with ops Alex Elder
2013-01-04 14:45 ` [PATCH REPOST 3/4] rbd: there is really only one op Alex Elder
2013-01-04 14:45 ` [PATCH REPOST 4/4] rbd: assume single op in a request Alex Elder
2013-01-17 2:27 ` Josh Durgin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50F761A5.6010702@inktank.com \
--to=josh.durgin@inktank.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=elder@inktank.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox