From: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
To: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Cc: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12, v2] rbd: send notify ack asynchronously
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:01:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5107AC03.70002@inktank.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <510162E0.1040403@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
On 01/24/2013 08:35 AM, Alex Elder wrote:
> When we receive notification of a change to an rbd image's header
> object we need to refresh our information about the image (its
> size and snapshot context). Once we have refreshed our rbd image
> we need to acknowledge the notification.
>
> This acknowledgement was previously done synchronously, but there's
> really no need to wait for it to complete.
>
> Change it so the caller doesn't wait for the notify acknowledgement
> request to complete. And change the name to reflect it's no longer
> synchronous.
>
> This resolves:
> http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/3877
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/rbd.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> index b952b2f..48650d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> @@ -1784,7 +1784,7 @@ static int rbd_img_request_submit(struct
> rbd_img_request *img_request)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int rbd_obj_notify_ack_sync(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev,
> +static int rbd_obj_notify_ack(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev,
> u64 ver, u64 notify_id)
> {
> struct rbd_obj_request *obj_request;
> @@ -1808,11 +1808,11 @@ static int rbd_obj_notify_ack_sync(struct
> rbd_device *rbd_dev,
> goto out;
>
> osdc = &rbd_dev->rbd_client->client->osdc;
> + obj_request->callback = rbd_obj_request_put;
> ret = rbd_obj_request_submit(osdc, obj_request);
> - if (!ret)
> - ret = rbd_obj_request_wait(obj_request);
> out:
> - rbd_obj_request_put(obj_request);
> + if (ret)
> + rbd_obj_request_put(obj_request);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -1834,7 +1834,7 @@ static void rbd_watch_cb(u64 ver, u64 notify_id,
> u8 opcode, void *data)
> rbd_warn(rbd_dev, "got notification but failed to "
> " update snaps: %d\n", rc);
>
> - rbd_obj_notify_ack_sync(rbd_dev, hver, notify_id);
> + rbd_obj_notify_ack(rbd_dev, hver, notify_id);
> }
>
> /*
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-29 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-22 22:25 [PATCH 00/12] rbd: new request tracking code Alex Elder
2013-01-22 22:28 ` [PATCH 01/12] " Alex Elder
2013-01-24 14:08 ` [PATCH 01/12, v2] " Alex Elder
2013-01-24 16:22 ` Alex Elder
2013-01-24 16:32 ` [PATCH 02/12, v2] rbd: kill rbd_rq_fn() and all other related code Alex Elder
2013-01-29 10:44 ` Josh Durgin
2013-01-24 16:32 ` [PATCH 03/12, v2] rbd: kill rbd_req_coll and rbd_request Alex Elder
2013-01-29 10:44 ` Josh Durgin
2013-01-24 16:33 ` [PATCH 04/12, v2] rbd: implement sync object read with new code Alex Elder
2013-01-29 10:48 ` Josh Durgin
2013-01-24 16:33 ` [PATCH 05/12, v2] rbd: get rid of rbd_req_sync_read() Alex Elder
2013-01-29 10:48 ` Josh Durgin
2013-01-24 16:33 ` [PATCH 06/12, v2] rbd: implement watch/unwatch with new code Alex Elder
2013-01-29 10:53 ` Josh Durgin
2013-01-24 16:34 ` [PATCH 07/12, v2] rbd: get rid of rbd_req_sync_watch() Alex Elder
2013-01-29 10:54 ` Josh Durgin
2013-01-24 16:34 ` [PATCH 08/12, v2] rbd: use new code for notify ack Alex Elder
2013-01-29 10:58 ` Josh Durgin
2013-01-24 16:35 ` [PATCH 09/12, v2] rbd: get rid of rbd_req_sync_notify_ack() Alex Elder
2013-01-29 10:59 ` Josh Durgin
2013-01-24 16:35 ` [PATCH 10/12, v2] rbd: send notify ack asynchronously Alex Elder
2013-01-29 11:01 ` Josh Durgin [this message]
2013-01-24 16:36 ` [PATCH 11/12, v2] rbd: implement sync method with new code Alex Elder
2013-01-29 11:10 ` Josh Durgin
2013-01-24 16:36 ` [PATCH 12/12, v2] rbd: get rid of rbd_req_sync_exec() Alex Elder
2013-01-29 11:10 ` Josh Durgin
2013-01-29 10:43 ` [PATCH 01/12, v2] rbd: new request tracking code Josh Durgin
2013-01-30 0:34 ` Alex Elder
2013-01-22 22:28 ` [PATCH 02/12] rbd: kill rbd_rq_fn() and all other related code Alex Elder
2013-01-22 22:29 ` [PATCH 03/12] rbd: kill rbd_req_coll and rbd_request Alex Elder
2013-01-22 22:29 ` [PATCH 04/12] rbd: implement sync object read with new code Alex Elder
2013-01-22 22:29 ` [PATCH 05/12] rbd: get rid of rbd_req_sync_read() Alex Elder
2013-01-22 22:29 ` [PATCH 06/12] rbd: implement watch/unwatch with new code Alex Elder
2013-01-22 22:30 ` [PATCH 07/12] rbd: get rid of rbd_req_sync_watch() Alex Elder
2013-01-22 22:30 ` [PATCH 08/12] rbd: use new code for notify ack Alex Elder
2013-01-22 22:30 ` [PATCH 09/12] rbd: get rid of rbd_req_sync_notify_ack() Alex Elder
2013-01-22 22:30 ` [PATCH 10/12] rbd: send notify ack asynchronously Alex Elder
2013-01-22 22:31 ` [PATCH 11/12] rbd: implement sync method with new code Alex Elder
2013-01-22 22:31 ` [PATCH 12/12] rbd: get rid of rbd_req_sync_exec() Alex Elder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5107AC03.70002@inktank.com \
--to=josh.durgin@inktank.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=elder@inktank.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox