From: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
To: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] rbd: use common code for probe and refresh
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 12:29:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <518AA788.7000801@inktank.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51885E06.8020201@inktank.com>
On 05/06/2013 06:51 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
> This is some work I had nearly done a long time ago. It didn't even
> have a bug associated with it. I resurrected it over the weekend
> and ported it to the new code.
>
> It's basically cleanup though. For format 1 rbd images, when
> probing an image, header information for it is read in and
> translated directly into the rbd_dev->header structure.
>
> For an image refresh, instead, we use a stack structure to
> hold the translated header, and then in a second step we
> copy that into rbd_dev->header.
>
> This series gets rid of the local variable, and always just
> puts things directly into rbd_dev->header. It also simplifies
> probe and refresh for both format 1 and format 2, using a
> common rbd_dev_vX_header_info() function for both purposes.
>
> This set of patches, as well as the two single patches
> and series of six I just posted, are available in the
> "review/wip-rbd-cleanup-1" branch of the ceph-client git
> repository.
>
> -Alex
>
> [PATCH 1/7] rbd: set the mapping size and features later
> [PATCH 2/7] rbd: zero format 1 header structure earlier
> [PATCH 3/7] rbd: refactor rbd_header_from_disk()
> [PATCH 4/7] rbd: update in-core header directly
> [PATCH 5/7] rbd: simplify rbd_dev_v1_probe()
> [PATCH 6/7] rbd: get rid of trivial v1 header wrappers
> [PATCH 7/7] rbd: define rbd_dev_v1_header_info()
These all look good.
The last one leaves the only call to rbd_dev_v2_parent_info() in
rbd_dev_v2_header_onetime(), but I'm guessing you already moved it
in your upcoming flatten-handling patches.
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-08 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-07 1:51 [PATCH 0/7] rbd: use common code for probe and refresh Alex Elder
2013-05-07 1:52 ` [PATCH 1/7] rbd: set the mapping size and features later Alex Elder
2013-05-07 1:52 ` [PATCH 2/7] rbd: zero format 1 header structure earlier Alex Elder
2013-05-07 1:53 ` [PATCH 3/7] rbd: refactor rbd_header_from_disk() Alex Elder
2013-05-07 1:53 ` [PATCH 4/7] rbd: update in-core header directly Alex Elder
2013-05-07 1:53 ` [PATCH 5/7] rbd: simplify rbd_dev_v1_probe() Alex Elder
2013-05-07 1:53 ` [PATCH 6/7] rbd: get rid of trivial v1 header wrappers Alex Elder
2013-05-07 1:54 ` [PATCH 7/7] rbd: define rbd_dev_v1_header_info() Alex Elder
2013-05-08 19:29 ` Josh Durgin [this message]
2013-05-08 20:39 ` [PATCH 0/7] rbd: use common code for probe and refresh Alex Elder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=518AA788.7000801@inktank.com \
--to=josh.durgin@inktank.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=elder@inktank.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox