From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for ceph (fwd) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:26:05 +0200 Message-ID: <5348F89D.3080407@dachary.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ARD55gGn7koBDfHG0xugOJf1JVFUpipoU" Return-path: Received: from smtp.dmail.dachary.org ([91.121.254.229]:48209 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751475AbaDLI0M (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Apr 2014 04:26:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sage Weil , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --ARD55gGn7koBDfHG0xugOJf1JVFUpipoU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'll deal with the problems found in gf-complete: http://tracker.ceph.com= /issues/8083 On 12/04/2014 06:06, Sage Weil wrote: > Several new defects. This wasn't running for the last couple of weeks = > because the submodules didn't update on the test checkout. >=20 --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --ARD55gGn7koBDfHG0xugOJf1JVFUpipoU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlNI+J0ACgkQ8dLMyEl6F21A5gCdHNPp+0Np7u3gaWLmqaac6isV wnEAoLYX2xBq2EGMa8VaQNJx7xGk+XoZ =+OZQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ARD55gGn7koBDfHG0xugOJf1JVFUpipoU--