From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: erasure code & reliability model Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 08:11:52 +0200 Message-ID: <5369CEA8.1000209@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4AxLfxlKROeWRH92FLeuXPEX2i4VLrvnn" Return-path: Received: from smtp.dmail.dachary.org ([91.121.254.229]:57131 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750795AbaEGGMN (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2014 02:12:13 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Koleos Fuskus Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --4AxLfxlKROeWRH92FLeuXPEX2i4VLrvnn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Veronica, I was really happy to hear you're going to work on the erasure code relia= bility model. Unless I'm mistaken your action plan was not published. Wou= ld you mind adding it to the wiki so I can comment on it ? Someone else m= ight be interested to contribute too. I've had a discussion yesterday abo= ut durability models (internally) and it is not well understood. Your ins= ight would be precious. Cheers --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --4AxLfxlKROeWRH92FLeuXPEX2i4VLrvnn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlNpzqgACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23aCACeOBHvzVDgCVzIeYkJBqlqeDdA 1TsAn044HSWxVvC09jRbStfYShYBZF19 =GNhY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4AxLfxlKROeWRH92FLeuXPEX2i4VLrvnn--