From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: RHEL7 source packages Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 18:16:22 +0200 Message-ID: <543957D6.5040801@dachary.org> References: <54395059.6030507@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NceQJUSlBLTarvJEeq7PmaoN9UbAAaGiU" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:42670 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752742AbaJKQQ2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Oct 2014 12:16:28 -0400 Received: from [10.9.0.6] (unknown [10.0.2.28]) by smtp.dmail.dachary.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52493420A2 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 18:16:22 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <54395059.6030507@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --NceQJUSlBLTarvJEeq7PmaoN9UbAAaGiU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [sent mail by mistake, here is the full version ;-] On 11/10/2014 17:44, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Ceph, >=20 > I find this line in https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/giant/ceph.spec.i= n#L382 >=20 > %if (0%{?rhel} || 0%{?rhel} < 7) >=20 > odd because it looks like exactly the same as >=20 > %if 0%{?rhel} >=20 > But it has been added a long time ago >=20 >=20 I filed a bug to followup http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9747 Cheers --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --NceQJUSlBLTarvJEeq7PmaoN9UbAAaGiU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlQ5V9YACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23+uQCgsTMyTF7usiOUUIAW8gJsvVo4 p9AAoLxwHARQCAxjG7bC6ixH2CI8VWoF =YS1V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NceQJUSlBLTarvJEeq7PmaoN9UbAAaGiU--