CEPH filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
To: "Matt W. Benjamin" <matt@cohortfs.com>,
	ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Casey Bodley <casey@cohortfs.com>
Subject: Re: ceph performance call:  buffer
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:16:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54400B8F.8090204@dachary.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1071486299.106.1413482432334.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1299 bytes --]

Hi Matt,

You will probably be interested in


On 16/10/2014 11:00, Matt W. Benjamin wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> 
> Per yesterday's Ceph performance call, we've pushed 2 wip branches for review and feedback to https://github.com/linuxbox2/linuxbox-ceph.git .
> 
> 1. xio-v084-inline reorganizes ceph::buffer as a namespace, and (nearly) all of
> buffer::hash, buffer::ptr and buffer::list as inline
> 
> 2. xio-v084-inline-flat restores some raw encapsulation lost in the prior change,
> then refactors buffer::raw to remove virtual methods
> 
> We've made some effort to measure the impact of the changes, but don't have
> reliable data yet.  (It's possible that our initial impression of improvement from the inlining change was not accurate, but more likely we need better workload tests.)
> 
> In addition, we've been working on an experiment to refactor buffer::ptr and buffer::raw to use boost::intrusive::list, to unify the interfaces of the two types to permit interning buffer::raw directly on the containing list when there is no sharing, and a slab allocator for both types.  We plan to push a wip branch with these changes to when they've stabilized a bit more and/or we have real perf numbers.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Matt
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-16 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-16 18:00 ceph performance call: buffer Matt W. Benjamin
2014-10-16 18:16 ` Loic Dachary [this message]
2014-10-16 18:21   ` Loic Dachary
2014-10-16 18:42     ` Matt W. Benjamin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54400B8F.8090204@dachary.org \
    --to=loic@dachary.org \
    --cc=casey@cohortfs.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@cohortfs.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox