CEPH filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wido den Hollander <wido@42on.com>
To: Dan van der Ster <daniel.vanderster@cern.ch>
Cc: ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Higher OSD disk util due to RBD snapshots from Dumpling to Firefly
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 08:55:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AE37E8.5000004@42on.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABZ+qqmrpRS32i0oSvJ9W=0RVz8f-aSb+9tYYgW1GwqGDqJ18A@mail.gmail.com>

On 01/07/2015 05:51 PM, Dan van der Ster wrote:
> Hi Wido,
> I've been trying to reproduce this but haven't been able yet.
> 
> What I've tried so far is use fio rbd with a 0.80.7 client connected
> to a 0.80.7 cluster. I created a 10GB format 2 block device, then
> measured the 4k randwrite iops before and after having snaps. I
> measured around 2000 iops to the image before any snapshots, then
> created 200 snapshots on the device and ran fio again. Initially the
> iops were low (I guess this is from the 4MB CoW resulting from the
> first 4k write to each underlying object). But eventually the speed
> stabilized to around 2000 iops again. Actually the initial slowdown
> was the same whether I created 1 snapshot or 200.
> 
> This was just quick subjective test so far, since from your report I
> was expecting something obvious to stick out. But it appears pretty
> OK, no? Would you have expected something different from these tests?
> 

Well, I'm not sure what to expect. But what I noticed is that when I
removed all the snapshots the slow requests were gone and the disk util
dropped on the OSDs.

Wido

> Cheers, Dan
> 
> 
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Wido den Hollander <wido@42on.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Last week I upgraded a 250 OSD cluster from Dumpling 0.67.10 to Firefly
>> 0.80.7 and after the upgrade there was a severe performance drop on the
>> cluster.
>>
>> It started raining slow requests after the upgrade and most of them
>> included a 'snapc' in the request.
>>
>> That lead me to investigate the RBD snapshots and I found that a rogue
>> process had created ~1800 snapshots spread out over 200 volumes.
>>
>> One image even had 181 snapshots!
>>
>> As the snapshots weren't used I removed them all and after the snapshots
>> were removed the performance of the cluster came back to normal level again.
>>
>> I'm wondering what changed between Dumpling and Firefly which caused
>> this? I saw OSDs spiking to 100% disk util constantly under Firefly
>> where this didn't happen with Dumpling.
>>
>> Did something change in the way OSDs handle RBD snapshots which causes
>> them to create more disk I/O?
>>
>> --
>> Wido den Hollander
>> 42on B.V.
>> Ceph trainer and consultant
>>
>> Phone: +31 (0)20 700 9902
>> Skype: contact42on
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


-- 
Wido den Hollander
42on B.V.
Ceph trainer and consultant

Phone: +31 (0)20 700 9902
Skype: contact42on

      reply	other threads:[~2015-01-08  7:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-31 16:21 Higher OSD disk util due to RBD snapshots from Dumpling to Firefly Wido den Hollander
2015-01-01  9:30 ` Stefan Priebe
2015-01-02 16:49   ` Samuel Just
2015-01-02 18:43     ` Stefan Priebe
2015-01-02 19:02       ` Samuel Just
2015-01-07 16:51 ` Dan van der Ster
2015-01-08  7:55   ` Wido den Hollander [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54AE37E8.5000004@42on.com \
    --to=wido@42on.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.vanderster@cern.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox