From: Wido den Hollander <wido@42on.com>
To: ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: 'Immutable bit' on pools to prevent deletion
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:46:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B7D2D6.4020503@42on.com> (raw)
Hi,
Although the userland tools like 'ceph' and 'rados' have a safeguard
against fat fingers when it comes to removing a pool there is no such
safeguard when using native librados.
The danger still exists that by accident you remove a pool which is then
completely gone, no way to restore it.
This is still something I find quite dangerous, so I was thinking about
a additional 'Immutable bit' which could be set on a pool before
rados_pool_delete() allows this pool to be removed.
Is it a sane thing to look at 'features' which pools could have? Other
features which might be set on a pool:
- Read Only (all write operations return -EPERM)
- Delete Protected
It's just that looking at a 20TB RBD pool and thinking that just one API
call could remove this pool make me a bit scared.
Am I the only one or is this something worth looking in to?
--
Wido den Hollander
42on B.V.
Ceph trainer and consultant
Phone: +31 (0)20 700 9902
Skype: contact42on
next reply other threads:[~2015-01-15 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-15 14:46 Wido den Hollander [this message]
2015-01-15 15:39 ` 'Immutable bit' on pools to prevent deletion Dan Van Der Ster
2015-01-15 15:52 ` Wido den Hollander
2015-01-15 15:45 ` Mike Dawson
2015-01-15 15:58 ` Yehuda Sadeh
2015-01-15 17:24 ` Sage Weil
2015-01-15 17:44 ` Sage Weil
2015-01-15 17:55 ` Gregory Farnum
2015-01-15 18:07 ` Sage Weil
2015-01-15 18:45 ` Gregory Farnum
2015-01-15 19:02 ` John Spray
2015-01-15 19:07 ` Sage Weil
2015-01-15 22:02 ` John Spray
2015-01-16 7:55 ` Wido den Hollander
2015-01-16 9:50 ` Sebastien Han
2015-01-16 10:55 ` Wido den Hollander
2015-01-16 14:46 ` Sage Weil
2015-01-19 19:32 ` Mykola Golub
2015-01-19 20:28 ` Sage Weil
[not found] ` <597309080.14312.1421421468640.open-xchange@websrv>
2015-01-16 20:45 ` Wido den Hollander
2015-01-17 2:31 ` Alex Elsayed
2015-01-17 13:11 ` Wido den Hollander
2015-01-17 16:24 ` Sage Weil
2015-01-17 19:09 ` Alex Elsayed
2015-01-17 23:28 ` David Zafman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54B7D2D6.4020503@42on.com \
--to=wido@42on.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox