CEPH filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wido den Hollander <wido@42on.com>
To: ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: 'Immutable bit' on pools to prevent deletion
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:46:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B7D2D6.4020503@42on.com> (raw)

Hi,

Although the userland tools like 'ceph' and 'rados' have a safeguard
against fat fingers when it comes to removing a pool there is no such
safeguard when using native librados.

The danger still exists that by accident you remove a pool which is then
completely gone, no way to restore it.

This is still something I find quite dangerous, so I was thinking about
a additional 'Immutable bit' which could be set on a pool before
rados_pool_delete() allows this pool to be removed.

Is it a sane thing to look at 'features' which pools could have? Other
features which might be set on a pool:

- Read Only (all write operations return -EPERM)
- Delete Protected

It's just that looking at a 20TB RBD pool and thinking that just one API
call could remove this pool make me a bit scared.

Am I the only one or is this something worth looking in to?

-- 
Wido den Hollander
42on B.V.
Ceph trainer and consultant

Phone: +31 (0)20 700 9902
Skype: contact42on

             reply	other threads:[~2015-01-15 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-15 14:46 Wido den Hollander [this message]
2015-01-15 15:39 ` 'Immutable bit' on pools to prevent deletion Dan Van Der Ster
2015-01-15 15:52   ` Wido den Hollander
2015-01-15 15:45 ` Mike Dawson
2015-01-15 15:58 ` Yehuda Sadeh
2015-01-15 17:24   ` Sage Weil
2015-01-15 17:44     ` Sage Weil
2015-01-15 17:55       ` Gregory Farnum
2015-01-15 18:07         ` Sage Weil
2015-01-15 18:45           ` Gregory Farnum
2015-01-15 19:02           ` John Spray
2015-01-15 19:07             ` Sage Weil
2015-01-15 22:02               ` John Spray
2015-01-16  7:55               ` Wido den Hollander
2015-01-16  9:50     ` Sebastien Han
2015-01-16 10:55       ` Wido den Hollander
2015-01-16 14:46         ` Sage Weil
2015-01-19 19:32           ` Mykola Golub
2015-01-19 20:28             ` Sage Weil
     [not found]         ` <597309080.14312.1421421468640.open-xchange@websrv>
2015-01-16 20:45           ` Wido den Hollander
2015-01-17  2:31 ` Alex Elsayed
2015-01-17 13:11   ` Wido den Hollander
2015-01-17 16:24   ` Sage Weil
2015-01-17 19:09     ` Alex Elsayed
2015-01-17 23:28       ` David Zafman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54B7D2D6.4020503@42on.com \
    --to=wido@42on.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox