From: Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
To: "Miyamae, Takeshi" <miyamae.takeshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Shiozawa, Kensuke" <shiozawa.kennsu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"Nakao, Takanori" <nakao.takanori@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"Paul Von-Stamwitz (PVonStamwitz@us.fujitsu.com)"
<PVonStamwitz@us.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: Deadline of Github pull request for Hammer release (question)
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:22:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54BE0243.60301@dachary.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <870DE8DBB716524BAE51B2D499EC81E40AA5B1F2@g01jpexmbyt24>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8731 bytes --]
Hi,
Thanks for the update. To speed up things, I could review what's already published. Did you add the tests already ?
Cheers
On 20/01/2015 01:48, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote:
> Hi Loic,
>
> Thank you for your advice which suggested providing SHEC as an extra-package.
> We believe it's generally a good idea, but we are hoping SHEC would be merged
> into Hammer because that would have an apparent advantage from a viewpoint of
> maintenance support.
>
> As for the thread safety issue, we totally agree with you and we are trying to solve it.
> We will complete it in a few days and we'd like to ask you to review it again so that
> it might be in time for Hammer's feature freeze (v0.93).
>
> Best regards,
> Takeshi Miyamae
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Loic Dachary
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 3:03 AM
> To: Miyamae, Takeshi/宮前 剛
> Cc: Ceph Development; Shiozawa, Kensuke/塩沢 賢輔; Nakao, Takanori/中尾 鷹詔; Paul Von-Stamwitz (PVonStamwitz@us.fujitsu.com)
> Subject: Re: Deadline of Github pull request for Hammer release (question)
>
> Hi,
>
> On 13/01/2015 18:05, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote:
>> Hi Loic,
>>
>> Thank you for your quick review.
>>
>>> Could you reference the jerasure files (they are in the jerasure
>>> plugin already) instead of including them in your patch ?
>>
>> We had used the reference of jerasure v2.0 files before, but changed
>> to including v1.2 files after the patent issue.
>
> If you are refering to http://erasure-code-patents.xyz/, it can safely be ignored.
>
>> However, we can restore the reference right away if we are needed.
>>
>>> In ::prepare you reuse the matrix, if possible. If your intention is
>>> to improve performances, you should consider using the same approach as the isa plugin.
>>
>> We have found a performance issue caused by redundant initializations
>> of the module, and solved it by caching the initialized variables in memory.
>> If that is the same approach as isa-plugin you mentioned, we also do
>> not have the same issue any more.
>
> The ISA plugin approach is thread safe, that's the important part.
>
>>> I'll have more comments once you have unit / functional tests
>>
>> We do have the those unit/functional tests, but the server is unreachable at this moment.
>> Please let us upload them to the repository tomorrow.
>
> Great.
>
>>> Regarding your initial question: I think it is too late for the Hammer release.
>>
>> We are so disappointed to hear that, but we must apologize for the late request.
>> If there would be any chance that SHEC be pulled into hammer, we are
>> very happy to conduct all the necessary tests by ourselves.
>> Please let us know the detailed schedule if this is a feasible option.
>
> Note that since this is a plugin it will be easy for someone to install it on a Hammer cluster, simply by copying the plugin files to each OSD / MON and restarting them. If there is some kind of urgency for you to be able to install this new plugin, I would advise making a package that contains just this file, restart the OSD once installed and recommend that the installation is done on all machines of the cluster (because every OSD / MON need to know about the plugin).
>
> Cheers
>
>> Best regards,
>> Takeshi Miyamae
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
>> [mailto:ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Loic Dachary
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 9:46 PM
>> To: Miyamae, Takeshi/宮前 剛
>> Cc: Ceph Development; Shiozawa, Kensuke/塩沢 賢輔; Nakao, Takanori/中尾 鷹詔;
>> Paul Von-Stamwitz (PVonStamwitz@us.fujitsu.com)
>> Subject: Re: Deadline of Github pull request for Hammer release
>> (question)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It's a great start :-) A few comments:
>>
>> Could you reference the jerasure files (they are in the jerasure plugin already) instead of including them in your patch ?
>>
>> In ::prepare you reuse the matrix, if possible. If your intention is
>> to improve performances, you should consider using the same approach
>> as the isa plugin. See
>> http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph/blob/giant/src/erasure-code/isa
>> /ErasureCodePluginIsa.cc#L36 which is and independent type
>> http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph/blob/giant/src/erasure-code/isa
>> /ErasureCodeIsaTableCache.h with only one instance and is populated as
>> needed and protected by a lock to make it thread safe :
>> http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph/blob/giant/src/erasure-code/isa
>> /ErasureCodeIsaTableCache.h#L101
>>
>> I'll have more comments once you have unit / functional tests ( similar to http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph/blob/giant/src/test/erasure-code/TestErasureCodeJerasure.cc ).
>>
>> Regarding your initial question: I think it is too late for the Hammer release. But from what I read it looks like we'll be able to merge in the early stages of the next release and that will give us time to properly test it.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> On 13/01/2015 11:34, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote:
>>> Hi Loic,
>>>
>>> I'm so sorry. The following is the correct repository.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/t-miyamae/ceph
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Takeshi Miyamae
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Loic Dachary [mailto:loic@dachary.org]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 7:26 PM
>>> To: Miyamae, Takeshi/宮前 剛
>>> Cc: Ceph Development; Shiozawa, Kensuke/塩沢 賢輔; Nakao, Takanori/中尾 鷹詔;
>>> Paul Von-Stamwitz (PVonStamwitz@us.fujitsu.com)
>>> Subject: Re: Deadline of Github pull request for Hammer release
>>> (question)
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 13/01/2015 11:24, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote:
>>>> Hi Loic,
>>>>
>>>>> Although we're late in the Hammer roadmap, it's a good time for an early preview. It will help show what needs to be changed to accomodate the SHEC plugin.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your advices.
>>>> We have uploaded our latest codes to the following folk repository for an early review.
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/miyamae-takeshi/multiple-shec
>>>
>>> It's 404 ? Is it a private repository maybe ?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> SHEC is located in src/erasure-code/shec directory.
>>>>
>>>> We are verifying SHEC's advantages on our Ceph cluster. It takes a little bit more.
>>>> Would you please start the review before that?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Takeshi Miyamae
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
>>>> [mailto:ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Loic Dachary
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2015 12:52 AM
>>>> To: Miyamae, Takeshi/宮前 剛
>>>> Cc: Ceph Development; Shiozawa, Kensuke/塩沢 賢輔; Nakao, Takanori/中尾 鷹詔
>>>> Subject: Re: Deadline of Github pull request for Hammer release
>>>> (question)
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 06/01/2015 12:49, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote:
>>>>> Dear Loic,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm Takeshi Miyamae, one of the authors of SHEC's blueprint.
>>>>>
>>>>> Shingled Erasure Code (SHEC)
>>>>> https://wiki.ceph.com/Planning/Blueprints/Hammer/Shingled_Erasure_C
>>>>> o
>>>>> d
>>>>> e
>>>>> _(SHEC)
>>>>
>>>> The work you have done is quite impressive :-)
>>>>
>>>>> We have revised our blueprint shown in the last CDS to extend our
>>>>> erasure code layouts and describe the guideline for choosing SHEC among various EC plugins.
>>>>> We believe the blueprint now answers all the comments given at the CDS.
>>>>
>>>> Great.
>>>>
>>>>> In addition, we would like to ask for your advice on the schedule
>>>>> of our github pull request. More specifically, we would like to
>>>>> know its deadline for Hammer release.
>>>>> (As we have not really completed our verification of SHEC, we are
>>>>> wondering if we should make it open for early preview.)
>>>>
>>>> Although we're late in the Hammer roadmap, it's a good time for an early preview. It will help show what needs to be changed to accomodate the SHEC plugin.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>>> Thank you in advance,
>>>>> Takeshi Miyamae
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel"
>>>>> in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More
>>>>> majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-20 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-06 11:49 Deadline of Github pull request for Hammer release (question) Miyamae, Takeshi
2015-01-06 15:51 ` Loic Dachary
2015-01-13 10:24 ` Miyamae, Takeshi
2015-01-13 10:26 ` Loic Dachary
2015-01-13 10:34 ` Miyamae, Takeshi
2015-01-13 12:45 ` Loic Dachary
2015-01-13 17:05 ` Miyamae, Takeshi
2015-01-13 18:03 ` Loic Dachary
2015-01-20 0:48 ` Miyamae, Takeshi
2015-01-20 7:22 ` Loic Dachary [this message]
2015-01-20 9:07 ` Miyamae, Takeshi
2015-01-21 14:12 ` Loic Dachary
2015-01-22 8:42 ` Miyamae, Takeshi
2015-01-22 9:28 ` Loic Dachary
2015-01-22 16:34 ` Miyamae, Takeshi
2015-01-22 17:29 ` Loic Dachary
2015-01-23 1:16 ` Miyamae, Takeshi
2015-01-23 9:08 ` Loic Dachary
2015-01-23 12:47 ` Miyamae, Takeshi
2015-01-23 13:38 ` Loic Dachary
2015-01-24 15:52 ` Miyamae, Takeshi
2015-01-21 14:31 ` Loic Dachary
2015-01-23 13:46 ` Loic Dachary
2015-01-26 5:43 ` Miyamae, Takeshi
2015-01-26 11:02 ` Loic Dachary
2015-01-26 8:00 ` Miyamae, Takeshi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54BE0243.60301@dachary.org \
--to=loic@dachary.org \
--cc=PVonStamwitz@us.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miyamae.takeshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=nakao.takanori@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=shiozawa.kennsu@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox