rgw and the next giant release

[Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2063 bytes --]

Hi Yehuda,

The rgw teuthology suite for the next giant release as found in https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/giant-backports came back (see http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-02-02_23:56:11-rgw-giant-backports---basic-multi) with one environmental error http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501#teuthology-run-6b08a729540c61f3c8b15c5a3ce9382634bf800c-february-2015. 

Do you think it is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?

Note that the integration branch now contains all the rgw pull requests targeting giant as listed here:

http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph-backports/wikis/giant#included-and-tested-in-integration-branch

Which includes cherry picks I did for the following as you suggested:

 - 9918  RGW-Swift: SubUser access permissions, does not seems to workminor
 - 10103 swift tests failing
upgrade:dumpling-firefly-x:parallel-next-distro-basic-multi run
 - 10471 rgw: metadata sync doesn't create subusers correctly
 - 9254  rgw: civetweb requires explicit \r\n for http headers
 - 9478  Incorrect content type in response header
 - 9479  ETag is not included in the XML response to put object copy
operationminor
 - 9877  In some cases it's possible for rgw to segfault on http COPY
 - 5595  object has a Content-Type, but its content_type property is
not shown in Swift object enumeration
 - 9907  Normal    radosgw-admin: can't disable max_size quota
 - 9973  Validation of Swift DLO manifest object ETag doesn't match
OpenStack Swift behavior
 - 10307 rgw: setting bucket attributes (swift POST on bucket)
sometimes failminor
 - 9587  ceph-radosgw sysvinit script on EL6 cannot set ulimit

Your original list included three more:

 - 9878  rhel7 s3-tests fail due to missing reason
 - 10329 rgw: s3 need to return SignatureDoesNotMatch instead of AccessDenied
 - 10334 rgw: s3 need to return InvalidAccessKeyId instead of AccessDenied

but you wrote that 10329 and 10334 do not need backporting and 9878 was already backported. 

Cheers
-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre




[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]