From: Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
To: Laurent GUERBY <laurent@guerby.net>
Cc: Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: giant integration branch for v0.87.1 ready for QE / fix for 10433/8011 ? osd/ReplicatedPG.cc: 5545: FAILED assert(soid < scrubber.start || soid >= scrubber.end)
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 08:59:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54FEA451.5090002@dachary.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425970573.3853.583.camel@pc2>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2891 bytes --]
Hi Laurent,
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8011 is now marked with a higher priority for backporting (I'm using the "Severity" field for that purpose). Please let me know if other backports need more attention.
Cheers
On 10/03/2015 07:56, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any reason why the complete fix for 8011/10433 was
> not included in giant 0.87.1?
>
> Missing fix:
> http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph/commit/9b26de3f3653d38dcdfc5b97874089f19d2a59d7
>
> Issues:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8011
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10433#note-7
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Laurent
>
> On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 16:49 -0500, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
>> Team leads,
>>
>> Please review QE validation results summary in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501
>>
>> Loic - this RC looks ready for release (in my opinion) !
>>
>> Thx
>> YuriW
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Yuri Weinstein" <yweinste@redhat.com>
>> To: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org>
>> Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
>> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 9:33:44 AM
>> Subject: Re: giant integration branch for v0.87.1 ready for QE
>>
>> I have completed suites execution on giant branch (v0.87.1 RC)
>>
>> All results are summarized in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501 under "QE VALIDATION" section.
>> Some suites had to be run more then ones due to environment noise.
>>
>> Two suites are being re-run now - upgrade:firefly-x and powecycle.
>>
>> Next steps:
>> - the team leads to review/confirm results
>> - Loic - can you review and triage issues as needed.
>> - two suites require results analysis:
>> multimds
>> rados (two known tickets, but need more checking) ## 10209, 9891
>> krbd (two new tickets, but need more checking) ## 10889, 10890
>>
>>
>> Thx
>> YuriW
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org>
>> To: "Yuri Weinstein" <yweinste@redhat.com>
>> Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 7:30:06 AM
>> Subject: Re: giant integration branch for v0.87.1 ready for QE
>>
>> Hi Yuri,
>>
>> The giant-backports pull requests were merged into https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/giant which is not ready for testing.
>>
>> For the record, the head is https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/78c71b9200da5e7d832ec58765478404d31ae6b5
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> On 10/02/2015 18:20, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>> Hi Yuri,
>>>
>>> The giant integration branch for v0.87.1 as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/giant-backports has been approved by Yehuda, Josh and Sam and is ready for QE.
>>>
>>> For the record, the head is https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/6b08a729540c61f3c8b15c5a3ce9382634bf800c
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>
>
>
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-10 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-10 17:20 giant integration branch for v0.87.1 ready for QE Loic Dachary
2015-02-11 15:30 ` Loic Dachary
2015-02-11 17:22 ` Yuri Weinstein
2015-02-11 18:03 ` Loic Dachary
2015-02-11 22:33 ` Yuri Weinstein
2015-02-16 17:33 ` Yuri Weinstein
2015-02-16 18:02 ` Sage Weil
[not found] ` <CAC6JEv8LEV5bNaoW3__2hjfYNZRmXDScp-a_1V+AKiX_SwWQCQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-02-16 18:49 ` Yuri Weinstein
2015-02-20 21:49 ` Yuri Weinstein
2015-03-10 6:56 ` giant integration branch for v0.87.1 ready for QE / fix for 10433/8011 ? osd/ReplicatedPG.cc: 5545: FAILED assert(soid < scrubber.start || soid >= scrubber.end) Laurent GUERBY
2015-03-10 7:59 ` Loic Dachary [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54FEA451.5090002@dachary.org \
--to=loic@dachary.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=laurent@guerby.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox