From: Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
To: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: puzzling disapearance of /dev/sdc1
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:10:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5672C258.1020700@dachary.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1512170530200.10312@cobra.newdream.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1729 bytes --]
Hi Sage,
On 17/12/2015 14:31, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2015, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Hi Ilya,
>>
>> This is another puzzling behavior (the log of all commands is at
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14094#note-4). in a nutshell, after a
>> series of sgdisk -i commands to examine various devices including
>> /dev/sdc1, the /dev/sdc1 file disappears (and I think it will showup
>> again although I don't have a definitive proof of this).
>>
>> It looks like a side effect of a previous partprobe command, the only
>> command I can think of that removes / re-adds devices. I thought calling
>> udevadm settle after running partprobe would be enough to ensure
>> partprobe completed (and since it takes as much as 2mn30 to return, I
>> would be shocked if it does not ;-).
>>
>> Any idea ? I desperately try to find a consistent behavior, something
>> reliable that we could use to say : "wait for the partition table to be
>> up to date in the kernel and all udev events generated by the partition
>> table update to complete".
>
> I wonder if the underlying issue is that we shouldn't be calling udevadm
> settle from something running from udev. Instead, of a udev-triggered
> run of ceph-disk does something that changes the partitions, it
> should just exit and let udevadm run ceph-disk again on the new
> devices...?
Unless I missed something this is on CentOS 7 and ceph-disk is only called from udev as ceph-disk trigger which does nothing else but asynchronously delegate the work to systemd. Therefore there is no udevadm settle from within udev (which would deadlock and timeout every time... I hope ;-).
Cheers
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-17 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-17 12:30 puzzling disapearance of /dev/sdc1 Loic Dachary
2015-12-17 13:31 ` Sage Weil
2015-12-17 14:10 ` Loic Dachary [this message]
2015-12-17 16:26 ` Ilya Dryomov
2015-12-18 12:38 ` Loic Dachary
2015-12-18 15:31 ` Ilya Dryomov
2015-12-18 16:23 ` Loic Dachary
2015-12-18 16:32 ` Loic Dachary
2015-12-18 16:34 ` Loic Dachary
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5672C258.1020700@dachary.org \
--to=loic@dachary.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=sage@newdream.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox