Re: CephFS and the next infernalis release v9.2.1

[Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>]

On 13/02/2016 01:13, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Abhishek Varshney
> <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com> wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> The next infernalis release as found at
>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/infernalis passed most of the CephFS
>> suite ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13750#note-19 ) except for 1
>> failure, which was not seen at a later run (
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13750#note-26 ). Do you think the
>> infernalis branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing
>> ?
> 
> Uh, assuming I'm reading this correctly, you've hit a known
> intermittent bug which happened to show up on one run, but not the
> next.
> 
> You can release without the fix (it's not a regression), but please
> realize that we have a lot of intermittent bugs so just because an
> issue doesn't appear in one run doesn't mean the issue is gone. :)

Hi Greg,

We realize there are intermittent bugs. This is why we're asking you to decide wether this specific bug should be a blocker for the release or not. What do you think ?

Cheers

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html