From: Jevon Qiao <scaleqiao@gmail.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: sage@newdream.net, haomaiwang@gmail.com,
gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gfarnum@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hw/9pfs: fix alignment issue when host filesystem block size is larger than client msize
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 16:56:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C6D8A0.2040502@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h9h7z9a0.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3425 bytes --]
Hi Aneesh,
> I am not sure I understand the details correctly. iounit is the size
> that we use in client_read to determine the size in which
> we should request I/O from the client. But we still can't do I/O in size
> larger than s->msize. If you look at the client side (kernel 9p fs), you
> will find
>
> rsize = fid->iounit;
> if (!rsize || rsize > clnt->msize-P9_IOHDRSZ)
> rsize = clnt->msize - P9_IOHDRSZ;
Yes, I know this.
> if your iounit calculation ends up zero, that should be handled
> correctly by
>
> if (!iounit) {
> iounit = s->msize - P9_IOHDRSZ;
> }
> return iounit;
>
>
> So what is the issue here. ?
This will result in an alignment issue while mapping the I/O requested by
client into pages in the function of p9_nr_pages().
int p9_nr_pages(char *data, int len)
{
unsigned long start_page, end_page;
start_page = (unsigned long)data >> PAGE_SHIFT;
end_page = ((unsigned long)data + len + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >>
PAGE_SHIFT;
return end_page - start_page;
}
Please see the following experiment I did without the fix.
1) Start qemu with cephfs,
$ qemu-system-x86_64 /root/CentOS---6.6-64bit---2015-03-06-a.qcow2
-smp 4 -m 4096 -fsdev
cephfs,security_model=passthrough,id=fsdev0,path=/ -device
virtio-9p-pci,id=fs0,fsdev=fsdev0,mount_tag=cephfs --enable-kvm
-nographic -net nic -net tap,ifname=tap0,script=no,downscript=no
2) Mount the fs in the guest.
[root@localhost ~]# mount -t 9p -o trans=virtio,version=9p2000.L
cephfs /mnt
[root@localhost ~]# ls -lah /mnt/8kfile
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8.0K 2016-02-19 09:37 /mnt/8kfile
In this case, I used the default msize which is 8192(in Byte). Since cephfs
is using 4M as the f_bsize, the iounit will be 8168 as P9_IOHDRSZ is
equal to 24.
3) Run the following systemtap script to trace the paging result,
[root@localhost ~]# cat p9_read.stp
probe kernel.function("p9_virtio_zc_request").call
{
printf("p9_virtio_zc_request: inlen size is %d\n", int_arg(5));
}
probe kernel.function("p9_nr_pages").call
{
printf("p9_nr_pages: start_page = %ld\n", int_arg(1) >> 12);
printf("p9_nr_pages: end_age = %ld\n", (int_arg(1) + 8168 +
4096 -1) >> 12);
}
4) The output I got when I copied out the file /mnt/8kfile to /tmp/
directory,
p9_virtio_zc_request: inlen size is 8168
p9_nr_pages: start_page = 34293757815
p9_nr_pages: end_age = 34293757818
Per the text in red(start_page = 34293757815, end_page = 34293757818),
it turns out 8k data will be mapped into three pages. This could hurt the
performance.
Actually, I enabled the cephfs debug functionality added by me to see
how the data is distributed in this case, the result is as follows,
CEPHFS_DEBUG: cephfs_preadv iov_len=4096
CEPHFS_DEBUG: cephfs_preadv iov_len=4072
CEPHFS_DEBUG: cephfs_preadv iov_len=24
This patch aims to fix this. And the result turns out it works quite
well, all the
data is well aligned.
p9_virtio_zc_request: inlen size is 4096
p9_nr_pages: start_page = 34203171814
p9_nr_pages: end_age = 34203171815
p9_virtio_zc_request: inlen size is 4096
p9_nr_pages: start_page = 34203171815
p9_nr_pages: end_age = 34203171816
CEPHFS_DEBUG: cephfs_preadv iov_len=4096
CEPHFS_DEBUG: cephfs_preadv iov_len=4096
Thanks,
Jevon
> -aneesh
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4740 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-19 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-14 7:35 [PATCH 2/2] hw/9pfs: fix alignment issue when host filesystem block size is larger than client msize Jevon Qiao
2016-02-14 13:38 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-17 7:14 ` Jevon Qiao
2016-02-17 10:24 ` Greg Kurz
2016-02-19 9:32 ` Jevon Qiao
2016-02-17 14:44 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-02-19 8:56 ` Jevon Qiao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56C6D8A0.2040502@gmail.com \
--to=scaleqiao@gmail.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gfarnum@redhat.com \
--cc=gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=haomaiwang@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sage@newdream.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox