From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: Building packages from a SHA instead of the tip of a branch Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 01:33:17 +0700 Message-ID: <56CF48ED.2020104@dachary.org> References: <56CEF369.7020403@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.194]:44216 "EHLO relay2-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933337AbcBYSd2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:33:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Gregory Farnum Cc: Gregory Meno , Alfredo Deza , Ceph Development Hi Greg, On 26/02/2016 00:37, Gregory Farnum wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Loic Dachary wrot= e: >> Hi Gregory and Alfredo, >> >> The system in place to build packages uses the tip of the stable bra= nch, which has been a recurring problem over the past years. It would m= ake a lot of sense to use a specific SHA1 instead of "whatever is at th= e tip of the stable branch at the moment". >> >> Is there already an issue in tracker.ceph.com for this ? If not, in = which tracker do you suggest I file this feature request ? >=20 > It might be easier to build from a tag or to push a specifically-name= d > branch (infernalis-release-2016-02-25) as well. Just to think around > the problem. ;) IIRC taging was not an option because people have scripts watching the = tags (it's a distant memory though, maybe it does not matter anymore ?)= =2E I like the idea of having an infernalis-release-2016-02-25 branch. = Unless the scripts are somehow sensitive to the branch name ? Cheers > -Greg >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html