From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: jewel pull requests process and timing Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:09:16 +0700 Message-ID: <56D1054C.6000001@dachary.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:33872 "EHLO relay5-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755218AbcB0CJ0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2016 21:09:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ken Dreyer , ceph-devel Hi Ken, On 27/02/2016 04:33, Ken Dreyer wrote: > Regarding whether pull request should go to master or to jewel first.= =2E. >=20 > When do we start doing separate cherry-picks from master into jewel? > Does that point in time correspond to the first RC version (10.1.0)? This is also my understanding. We start cherry-picking when we stop mer= ging the jewel branch back in master, which is about the only thing tha= t separates X.0.Z from X.1.Z. But since it's the first time I formulate that, I may be completely wro= ng ;-) Cheers >=20 > - Ken > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel"= in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html