From: Owen Synge <osynge@suse.com>
To: Sage Weil <sweil@redhat.com>
Cc: Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@redhat.com>,
Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
ldachary@redhat.com
Subject: Re: The fundamental evil of "magic" in computing systems -> Was: mon daemon makes authentication side effects on startup
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 17:40:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57067F56.2000705@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1604070959160.19675@cpach.fuggernut.com>
On 04/07/2016 04:03 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, Owen Synge wrote:
>> Hi Sage,
>>
>> On 04/07/2016 02:26 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
>>> Hi Owen,
>>>
>>> I never really liked ceph-create-keys either, but it simplified the
>>> deployment process.
>>
>> I would propose we do this in two stages.
>>
>> (A) Remove calling the command from the init scripts as a side effect of
>> starting the mon.
>>
>> This allows us to get most of the issues solved.
>>
>> (B) Remove the command.
>>
>> This is the long term goal, which is not as urgent in my opinion but
>> others may disagree.
>
> Works for me. We just need to change ceph-deploy and get the other
> install/deploy tool folks on board before A.
Are you intending to get this into Jewel?
I had assumed this would only be done on master, and only come into the
next release.
As a change to master I felt that we could just do (A) as soon as
ceph-deploy works without the mon boot up scripts calling
ceph-create-keys, ideally without having ceph-create-keys in
ceph-deploy's process.
We can then file bugs as needed against other install processes that
depend on ceph-create-keys, and they can test against master.
>>> I have no problem with removing it as long as we make
>>> sure the deployment process doesn't too much harder for ceph-deploy users.
>>
>> The documentation for the manual process without using ceph-deploy will
>> need to be changed if we remove calling ceph-create-keys from the boot
>> scripts.
>
> Yeah.
>
>> For ceph-deploy users I think we should see if any changes to the
>> process are needed, the next question is will any be wanted?
>
> Actually, thinking about it a bit more, I don't think ceph-deploy usage
> has to change at all. The old way was
>
> 1. ceph-create-keys creates and installs the keys on the mons
> 2. ceph-deploy gatherkeys or create-initial slurps them up
>
> We can just change ceph-deploy so it creates and stores them locally, and
> doesn't store them on the mons at all. Users don't get the side-effect
> that the mons have the keys installed, but that is arguably better anyway.
>
>> https://github.com/SUSE/ceph-deploy/commit/58b030dbe0a964b32f1fbc9a3762e64dd74bf50c
>
> Instead of this, it should do the same steps as ceph-create-keys (use the
> mon. internal key to authenticate to create the admin and bootstrap
> keys), but just write them to the local ceph-dpeloy work dir.
That sounds like a better plan than my idea of just using
ceph-create-keys in ceph-deploy to me.
Best regards
Owen
--
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG
Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstraße 5
90409 Nürnberg
Germany
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-07 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-05 11:56 mon daemon makes authentication side effects on startup Owen Synge
2016-04-05 18:35 ` John Spray
2016-04-05 23:18 ` Owen Synge
2016-04-05 20:14 ` Gregory Farnum
2016-04-06 8:23 ` The fundamental evil of "magic" in computing systems -> Was: " Owen Synge
2016-04-07 7:49 ` Jens Rosenboom
2016-04-07 11:44 ` Owen Synge
2016-04-07 12:26 ` Sage Weil
2016-04-07 13:54 ` Owen Synge
2016-04-07 14:03 ` Sage Weil
2016-04-07 14:23 ` Gregory Farnum
2016-04-07 14:39 ` Sage Weil
2016-04-07 15:40 ` Owen Synge [this message]
2016-04-07 15:43 ` Sage Weil
2016-04-08 20:57 ` Owen Synge
2016-04-11 13:53 ` Owen Synge
2016-05-12 13:06 ` Sage Weil
2016-05-20 13:01 ` Owen Synge
2016-05-25 10:21 ` Owen Synge
2016-05-25 12:45 ` Sage Weil
2016-05-30 14:50 ` Owen Synge
2016-05-31 19:03 ` Alfredo Deza
2016-04-07 12:33 ` Alfredo Deza
2016-04-07 13:12 ` Owen Synge
2016-04-07 14:22 ` Gregory Farnum
2016-04-07 16:08 ` Owen Synge
2016-04-07 16:51 ` Gregory Farnum
2016-04-07 20:40 ` Mark Nelson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57067F56.2000705@suse.com \
--to=osynge@suse.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gfarnum@redhat.com \
--cc=ldachary@redhat.com \
--cc=sweil@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox