From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: Upcoming 10.2.4 Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:52:06 +0200 Message-ID: <58074246.7030904@dachary.org> References: <57FB7494.1010309@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from slow1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.86]:57045 "EHLO slow1-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S941078AbcJSOTK (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:19:10 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) by slow1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F2847EDEE for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:52:42 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <57FB7494.1010309@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Abhishek L Cc: Ceph Development Hi Abhishek, Unless I missed something, all backports that matter are now in the last round of testing[1]. If we're lucky all backports in the testing branch (jewel-backports) will be merged. Even if it's not the case I'll make sure at least all the urgent ones[2] are. If the test infrastructure permits, I should be able to propose you to cut 10.2.4 early next week. Cheers [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-16 [2] http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96 On 10/10/2016 12:59, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Abhishek, > > Since you're now release manager, it is my understanding that we'll be asking you if the release should be cut or not. I updated the issue tracking the progress of 10.2.4 accordingly. This is a heads up to let you know we'll most likely ask that question for 10.2.4 some time next week ;-) > > Cheers > > [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/journals/diff/79457?detail_id=76318 > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre