From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Zafman Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] EC backfill retries Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 10:15:36 -0700 Message-ID: <5b00ea2e-fd73-fa15-8e9e-8e2db59541fc@redhat.com> References: <06c85dc1-3318-fc05-ec1a-7f68d3aecc37@redhat.com> <52362dc8-faca-82f4-b1ac-dc7df6150afe@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42412 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934469AbdDGRPx (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Apr 2017 13:15:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org See my pull request consisting of my assembly of your patch: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/14054 David On 4/7/17 8:16 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Mar 16, 2017, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > >> On Mar 15, 2017, David Zafman wrote: >>> If it applies cleanly >> It did when I created it. > And the 3 patches applied cleanly as I prepared to build my patched > 10.2.6, so I can't imagine why they would have conflicted for you. Are > you sure you were trying to apply them to the jewel branch? > >> According to my logs, the commits I cherry-picked, that I referenced by >> issue, were: >> 82f5cc63404ce9f680d714fc85148946f2b2c376 (your patch for 13937) >> (cherry picked from commit c51d70e1e837c972e42ddd5fa66f7ca4477b95cc) >> b3224a18f6acc7ed54c2162b140a33b6146a16be (Kefu Chai's patch for 17857)