From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub Subject: Re: ceph:rgw issue #10698 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 12:08:32 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <784895333.6829144.1424192912653.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <54E32EFE.4080209@switch.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.25]:44683 "EHLO mx4-phx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751971AbbBQRIi (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2015 12:08:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54E32EFE.4080209@switch.ch> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Valery Tschopp Cc: ceph-devel ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Valery Tschopp" > To: yehuda@redhat.com, "ceph-devel" > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 4:07:26 AM > Subject: ceph:rgw issue #10698 > > Hello Yehuda, > > The issue http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10698 "rgw: not failing POST > requests if keystone not configured" is marked as resolved, but I don't > think it is backported in firefly. > > Issue http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10062 should already be backported, > if I'm not wrong... > Neither made it in. The bug wasn't set to be backported to firefly. We can set it to get backported if there's a demand, however, I'm not sure that it's going to be a trivial backport. Yehuda