CEPH filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre DERUMIER <aderumier@odiso.com>
To: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Cc: Mark Nelson <mnelson@redhat.com>, Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>,
	ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 10 times higher disk load with btrfs
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 04:44:27 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <912779433.3244878.1420515867862.JavaMail.zimbra@oxygem.tv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <713980925.3244877.1420515858378.JavaMail.zimbra@oxygem.tv>

Hi Stefan,

Do you see a difference if you force filestore journal writeahead for btrfs instead parrallel ?

filestore journal writeahead = 1
filestore journal parallel = 0

----- Mail original -----
De: "Stefan Priebe" <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
À: "Mark Nelson" <mnelson@redhat.com>, "Sage Weil" <sage@newdream.net>
Cc: "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Envoyé: Lundi 5 Janvier 2015 21:33:22
Objet: Re: 10 times higher disk load with btrfs

Am 05.01.2015 um 21:29 schrieb Mark Nelson: 
> 
> 
> On 01/05/2015 02:20 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote: 
>> Hi Sage, 
>> 
>> Am 05.01.2015 um 20:25 schrieb Sage Weil: 
>>> On Mon, 5 Jan 2015, Stefan Priebe wrote: 
>>>> 
>>>> Am 05.01.2015 um 19:36 schrieb Stefan Priebe: 
>>>>> Hi devs, 
>>>>> 
>>>>> while btrfs is now declared as stable ;-) i wanted to retest btrfs on 
>>>>> our production cluster on 2 out of 54 osds. So if they crash it 
>>>>> doesn't 
>>>>> hurt. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> While if those OSDs run XFS have spikes of 20MB/s every 4-7s. The same 
>>>>> OSDs after formatting them with btrfs have spikes of 190MB/s every 
>>>>> 4-7s. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Why does just another filesystem raises the disk load by a factor of 
>>>>> 10? 
>>>> 
>>>> OK this seems to happen cause ceph is creating every 5s a new 
>>>> subvolume / 
>>>> snap. Is this really expected / needed? 
>>> 
>>> You can disable it with 
>>> 
>>> filestore btrfs snap = false 
>>> 
>>> I'm curious how much this drops the load down; originally the 
>>> snaps were no more expensive than a regular sync but perhaps this 
>>> has changed... 
>> 
>> - with XFS the average write is at 9Mb/s 
>> - with btrfs (filestore_btrfs_snap=true) write is at 40Mb/s 
>> - with btrfs (filestore_btrfs_snap=false) write is at 20Mb/s 
> 
> Is that the average and not the spikes? It looks like before the spikes 
> were 20MB/s and 190MB/s? 

Yes these are average values. 

Spikes: 
- with XFS the spike write is at 20Mb/s 
- with btrfs (filestore_btrfs_snap=true) spike write is 200Mb/s 
- with btrfs (filestore_btrfs_snap=false) spike is still 185Mb/s but avg 
is 1/2 (20Mb/s) see above 


> 
>> 
>> Stefan 
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in 
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org 
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html 
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in 
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org 
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-01-06  3:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-05 18:36 10 times higher disk load with btrfs Stefan Priebe
2015-01-05 19:19 ` Stefan Priebe
2015-01-05 19:25   ` Sage Weil
2015-01-05 20:20     ` Stefan Priebe
2015-01-05 20:29       ` Mark Nelson
2015-01-05 20:33         ` Stefan Priebe
     [not found]           ` <713980925.3244877.1420515858378.JavaMail.zimbra@oxygem.tv>
2015-01-06  3:44             ` Alexandre DERUMIER [this message]
2015-01-06  7:01               ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=912779433.3244878.1420515867862.JavaMail.zimbra@oxygem.tv \
    --to=aderumier@odiso.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mnelson@redhat.com \
    --cc=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
    --cc=sage@newdream.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox