From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xiubli@redhat.com, idryomov@gmail.com, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] libceph: add new iov_iter msg_data type and use it for reads
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2022 08:59:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a28932b4f81766e9e1fc22f008f527f578af91f3.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YsKBGq99GNpL5jMu@infradead.org>
On Sun, 2022-07-03 at 22:56 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 06:30:11AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > Currently, we take an iov_iter from the netfs layer, turn that into an
> > array of pages, and then pass that to the messenger which eventually
> > turns that back into an iov_iter before handing it back to the socket.
> >
> > This patchset adds a new ceph_msg_data_type that uses an iov_iter
> > directly instead of requiring an array of pages or bvecs. This allows
> > us to avoid an extra allocation in the buffered read path, and should
> > make it easier to plumb in write helpers later.
> >
> > For now, this is still just a slow, stupid implementation that hands
> > the socket layer a page at a time like the existing messenger does. It
> > doesn't yet attempt to pass through the iov_iter directly.
> >
> > I have some patches that pass the cursor's iov_iter directly to the
> > socket in the receive path, but it requires some infrastructure that's
> > not in mainline yet (iov_iter_scan(), for instance). It should be
> > possible to something similar in the send path as well.
>
> Btw, is there any good reason to not simply replace ceph_msg_data
> with an iov_iter entirely?
>
Not really, no.
What I'd probably do is change the existing osd_req_op_* callers to use
the new iov_iter msg_data type first, and then once they all were you
could phase out the use of struct ceph_msg_data altogether.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-05 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-01 10:30 [PATCH v3 0/2] libceph: add new iov_iter msg_data type and use it for reads Jeff Layton
2022-07-01 10:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] libceph: add new iov_iter-based ceph_msg_data_type and ceph_osd_data_type Jeff Layton
2022-07-01 10:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ceph: use osd_req_op_extent_osd_iter for netfs reads Jeff Layton
2022-07-04 1:55 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] libceph: add new iov_iter msg_data type and use it for reads Xiubo Li
2022-07-04 5:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-05 12:59 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a28932b4f81766e9e1fc22f008f527f578af91f3.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox