From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDFC231A7FE; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 18:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764010712; cv=none; b=B1uyOXtdq6SZqgf6tQA1plQNmPaTkdAgBt5KwF23UA5tVEOGwHRP1iPOKvhjspAqCWiwkrcymG4q32PYFpnnUJd0PQ4i1vUVWm+NNVtxyz3dp9SB8ylTkLFMxDFIbZ1a5UAZAQRvJ9nyel8O43BLXES7DMqV3oMzvh7RmQ1pliY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764010712; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zFdNVV0jn5E5G65Xthdrt9zFFxdKKVR50LKSwwLzc9w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=n22nkvH6k8V0x8dKIV9ITnIaVgdw+Q3w+Rk3kQ7725fIhf/9f5Kw93ZpKZ/5nTxc2R3dZoRAdAS9INM5QlZjcWIxF4S21WGyU6cxsJC+K7Qo0YCDgaNl4yspSoKZVwlJZ8h3vbkonlvYKKnJF8kAd5Je9mzvBY7iQoMxHiZbJw0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=PICKOpzx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="PICKOpzx" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1764010710; x=1795546710; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=zFdNVV0jn5E5G65Xthdrt9zFFxdKKVR50LKSwwLzc9w=; b=PICKOpzxezk3jGb/xHGASOAJ19Z0SmZhXOepWrrqa9auhRBaOFIb1VUy HsMgZ/H0JplXMHTH+9PZ6cxpmPf6PjBo3Ftljj/7sb7g+KggS8KpTr52S EAwJZXV1tZRY98BnNcFK2384DWdHXUrGBExB4lAfJAdZTWThdsl/8aPAu pJhBxsjrKlEVbTLfBOTds0G5eaUcVc55EsyiT/KoeWbFv7ZzpheBwzXGj tFJmQ1JUxlxb7pW09UF73P+1ss6uiVjs2O8UZKCFVjA42BHGfoZgPaqnY pGtgdLjbi/RStNO0CB0es65DBZzNHFbFAzFTmOzxCqXOI8CkPtMtc5nZw Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: nIWoIXvSQluhVlGNciMIqA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: A/a3hm6yTEumimgZwCUI7g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11623"; a="69882214" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,223,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="69882214" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by fmvoesa106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Nov 2025 10:58:29 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: UYK5U28QTR2lQkyXiGmwTw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 9F/x9o02SVysBTh6YrcJ1Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,223,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="196856728" Received: from egrumbac-mobl6.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.5]) by orviesa004-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Nov 2025 10:58:27 -0800 Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 20:58:24 +0200 From: "andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com" To: Viacheslav Dubeyko Cc: Xiubo Li , "justinstitt@google.com" , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" , "llvm@lists.linux.dev" , "morbo@google.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "nathan@kernel.org" , "idryomov@gmail.com" , "nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ceph: Amend checking to fix `make W=1` build breakage Message-ID: References: <20251110144404.369928-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <9f7339a71c281e9f9e5b1ff34f7c277f62c89a69.camel@ibm.com> <82c49caff875cc131951a7e5d59ecb45efbb9224.camel@ibm.com> <1ab8c386d50d024d0deb8a8c2fee501aae30909b.camel@ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1ab8c386d50d024d0deb8a8c2fee501aae30909b.camel@ibm.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 06:49:26PM +0000, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote: > On Mon, 2025-11-24 at 20:43 +0200, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 05:47:04PM +0000, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote: > > > On Mon, 2025-11-24 at 17:09 +0200, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 08:42:13PM +0000, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2025-11-10 at 21:43 +0200, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote: ... > > > > > I think we can take the patch as it. It looks good. Probably, it makes sense to > > > > > take a deeper look in the code on our side. > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko > > > > > > > > Thanks, can this be applied? My builds are still broken. > > > > > > The patchset has been applied on testing branch already [1]. > > > > Thanks for the information. The Linux Next still has no that branch in. > > I recommend to write Stephen a message to include your testing branch or > > something like that into Linux Next, so it will get more test coverage. > > It's not my personal branch. :) It's the branch that receives all new patches > for CephFS kernel client and, usually, it is used for internal testing by Ceph > team. Exactly, that's why my proposal. I would not recommend to do the same for a (semi-)private branches. > Ilya gathers all patches from there and sends it upstream. So, we need to > ping Ilya. :) > > > Ilya, when are we planning to send this patchset upstream? > > > > > [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph-client.git -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko