From: Mark Nelson <mnelson@redhat.com>
To: Wido den Hollander <wido@42on.com>,
ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BlueStore and maximum number of objects per PG
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:10:28 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8c97891-c009-7db8-64f4-045bbd751277@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50637955.12140.1489066717440@ox.pcextreme.nl>
On 03/09/2017 07:38 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>> Op 22 februari 2017 om 11:51 schreef Wido den Hollander <wido@42on.com>:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Op 22 februari 2017 om 3:53 schreef Mark Nelson <mnelson@redhat.com>:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Wido,
>>>
>>> On 02/21/2017 02:04 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm about to start a test where I'll be putting a lot of objects into BlueStore and see how it holds.
>>>>
>>>> The reasoning behind is that I have a customer which has 165M objects in it's cluster which results in some PGs having 900k objects.
>>>>
>>>> For FileStore with XFS this is quite heavy. A simple scrub takes ages.
>>>>
>>>> The problem is that we can't simply increase the number of PGs since that will overload the OSDs as well.
>>>>
>>>> On the other hand we could add hardware, but that also takes time.
>>>>
>>>> So just for the sake of testing I'm looking at trying to replicate this situation using BlueStore from master.
>>>>
>>>> Is there anything I should take into account? I'll probably be just creating a lot (millions) of 100 byte objects in the cluster with just a few PGs.
>>>
>>> Couple of general things:
>>>
>>> I don't anticipate you'll run into the same kind of pg splitting
>>> slowdowns that you see with filestore, but you still may see some
>>> slowdown as the object count increases since rocksdb will have more
>>> key/value pairs to deal with. I expect you'll see a lot of metadata
>>> movement between levels as it tries to keep things organized. One thing
>>> to note is that it's possible you may see rocksdb bottlenecks as the OSD
>>> volume size increases. This is one of the things the guys at Sandisk
>>> were trying to tackle with Zetascale.
>>>
>>
>> Ah, ok!
>>
>>> If you can put the rocksdb DB and WAL on SSDs that will likely help, but
>>> you'll want to be mindful of how full the SSDs are getting. I'll be
>>> very curious to see how your tests go, it's been a while since we've
>>> thrown that many objects on a bluestore cluster (back around the
>>> newstore timeframe we filled bluestore with many 10s of millions of
>>> objects and from what I remember it did pretty well).
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the information! I'll try first with a few OSDs and size = 1 and just put a lot of small objects in the PG and see how it goes.
>>
>> Will time the latency for writing and reading the objects afterwards to see how it goes.
>
> First test, one OSD running inside VirtualBox with a 300GB disk and Luminous.
>
> 1 OSD, size = 1, pg_num = 8.
>
> After 2.5M objects the disk was full... but the OSD was still working fine. Didn't experience any issues. Although the OSD was using 3.4GB of RAM at that moment while I stopped doing I/O.
Glad to hear it continued to work well! That's pretty much how my
testing went the last time I did scaling tests. Based on your test
parameters, it sounds like you hit something like ~300-400K objects per
PG? Did you get a chance to try filestore with the same parameters?
The memory usage is not too surprising, bluestore uses it's own cache.
We may still need to tweak the defaults a bit, though there are obvious
trade-offs. Hopefully Igor's patches should help here.
>
> 2.5M objects of 128 bytes written to the disk.
>
> Would like to scale this test out further, but I don't have hardware available to run it on.
>
> Wido
>
>>
>> Wido
>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Wido
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-09 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-21 20:04 BlueStore and maximum number of objects per PG Wido den Hollander
2017-02-22 2:53 ` Mark Nelson
2017-02-22 10:51 ` Wido den Hollander
2017-03-09 13:38 ` Wido den Hollander
2017-03-09 14:10 ` Mark Nelson [this message]
2017-03-10 10:23 ` Wido den Hollander
2017-02-22 14:34 ` Mike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d8c97891-c009-7db8-64f4-045bbd751277@redhat.com \
--to=mnelson@redhat.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wido@42on.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox