CEPH filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, idryomov@gmail.com
Cc: sage@redhat.com, zyan@redhat.com, pdonnell@redhat.com,
	ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/5] ceph: add caps perf metric for each session
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 09:51:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff394699-2de4-c3ba-9b11-0730acf7d4df@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a654d3d4765741594e9c49ef62ba1d0ab41e3960.camel@kernel.org>

On 2020/2/21 20:00, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 02:05 -0500, xiubli@redhat.com wrote:
>> From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
>>
>> This will fulfill the cap hit/mis metric stuff per-superblock,
>> it will count the hit/mis counters based each inode, and if one
>> inode's 'issued & ~revoking == mask' will mean a hit, or a miss.
>>
>> item          total           miss            hit
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> caps          295             107             4119
>>
>> URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/43215
>> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/ceph/acl.c        |  2 +-
>>   fs/ceph/caps.c       | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   fs/ceph/debugfs.c    | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>   fs/ceph/dir.c        |  5 +++--
>>   fs/ceph/inode.c      |  4 ++--
>>   fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>   fs/ceph/metric.h     | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   fs/ceph/super.h      |  8 +++++---
>>   fs/ceph/xattr.c      |  4 ++--
>>   9 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ceph/acl.c b/fs/ceph/acl.c
>> index 26be6520d3fb..e0465741c591 100644
>> --- a/fs/ceph/acl.c
>> +++ b/fs/ceph/acl.c
>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ static inline void ceph_set_cached_acl(struct inode *inode,
>>   	struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
>>   
>>   	spin_lock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
>> -	if (__ceph_caps_issued_mask(ci, CEPH_CAP_XATTR_SHARED, 0))
>> +	if (__ceph_caps_issued_mask_metric(ci, CEPH_CAP_XATTR_SHARED, 0))
>>   		set_cached_acl(inode, type, acl);
>>   	else
>>   		forget_cached_acl(inode, type);
> nit: calling __ceph_caps_issued_mask_metric means that you have an extra
> branch. One to set/forget acl and one to update the counter.
>
> This would be (very slightly) more efficient if you just put the cap
> hit/miss calls inside the existing if block above. IOW, you could just
> do:
>
> if (__ceph_caps_issued_mask(ci, CEPH_CAP_XATTR_SHARED, 0)) {
> 	set_cached_acl(inode, type, acl);
> 	ceph_update_cap_hit(&fsc->mdsc->metric);
> } else {
> 	forget_cached_acl(inode, type);
> 	ceph_update_cap_mis(&fsc->mdsc->metric);
> }

Yeah, this will works well here.


>> diff --git a/fs/ceph/dir.c b/fs/ceph/dir.c
>> index ff1714fe03aa..227949c3deb8 100644
>> --- a/fs/ceph/dir.c
>> +++ b/fs/ceph/dir.c
>> @@ -346,8 +346,9 @@ static int ceph_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)
>>   	    !ceph_test_mount_opt(fsc, NOASYNCREADDIR) &&
>>   	    ceph_snap(inode) != CEPH_SNAPDIR &&
>>   	    __ceph_dir_is_complete_ordered(ci) &&
>> -	    __ceph_caps_issued_mask(ci, CEPH_CAP_FILE_SHARED, 1)) {
>> +	    __ceph_caps_issued_mask_metric(ci, CEPH_CAP_FILE_SHARED, 1)) {
> These could also just be cap_hit/mis calls inside the existing if
> blocks.

Yeah, right in the if branch we can be sure that the 
__ceph_caps_issued_mask() is called. But in the else branch we still 
need to get the return value from (rc = __ceph_caps_issued_mask()), and 
only when "rc == 0" cap_mis will need. This could simplify the code here 
and below.

This is main reason to add the __ceph_caps_issued_mask_metric() here. 
And if you do not like this approach I will switch it back :-)

>
>> @@ -7,5 +7,24 @@ struct ceph_client_metric {
>>   	atomic64_t            total_dentries;
>>   	struct percpu_counter d_lease_hit;
>>   	struct percpu_counter d_lease_mis;
>> +
>> +	struct percpu_counter i_caps_hit;
>> +	struct percpu_counter i_caps_mis;
>>   };
>> +
>> +static inline void ceph_update_cap_hit(struct ceph_client_metric *m)
>> +{
>> +	if (!m)
>> +		return;
>> +
> When are these ever NULL?

Will delete it.

Thanks

BRs

>
>> +	percpu_counter_inc(&m->i_caps_hit);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void ceph_update_cap_mis(struct ceph_client_metric *m)
>> +{
>> +	if (!m)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	percpu_counter_inc(&m->i_caps_mis);
>> +}
>>   #endif /* _FS_CEPH_MDS_METRIC_H */
>> diff --git a/fs/ceph/super.h b/fs/ceph/super.h
>> index ebcf7612eac9..4b269dc845bb 100644
>> --- a/fs/ceph/super.h
>> +++ b/fs/ceph/super.h
>> @@ -639,6 +639,8 @@ static inline bool __ceph_is_any_real_caps(struct ceph_inode_info *ci)
>>   
>>   extern int __ceph_caps_issued(struct ceph_inode_info *ci, int *implemented);
>>   extern int __ceph_caps_issued_mask(struct ceph_inode_info *ci, int mask, int t);
>> +extern int __ceph_caps_issued_mask_metric(struct ceph_inode_info *ci, int mask,
>> +					  int t);
>>   extern int __ceph_caps_issued_other(struct ceph_inode_info *ci,
>>   				    struct ceph_cap *cap);
>>   
>> @@ -651,12 +653,12 @@ static inline int ceph_caps_issued(struct ceph_inode_info *ci)
>>   	return issued;
>>   }
>>   
>> -static inline int ceph_caps_issued_mask(struct ceph_inode_info *ci, int mask,
>> -					int touch)
>> +static inline int ceph_caps_issued_mask_metric(struct ceph_inode_info *ci,
>> +					       int mask, int touch)
>>   {
>>   	int r;
>>   	spin_lock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
>> -	r = __ceph_caps_issued_mask(ci, mask, touch);
>> +	r = __ceph_caps_issued_mask_metric(ci, mask, touch);
>>   	spin_unlock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
>>   	return r;
>>   }
>> diff --git a/fs/ceph/xattr.c b/fs/ceph/xattr.c
>> index 7b8a070a782d..71ee34d160c3 100644
>> --- a/fs/ceph/xattr.c
>> +++ b/fs/ceph/xattr.c
>> @@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ ssize_t __ceph_getxattr(struct inode *inode, const char *name, void *value,
>>   
>>   	if (ci->i_xattrs.version == 0 ||
>>   	    !((req_mask & CEPH_CAP_XATTR_SHARED) ||
>> -	      __ceph_caps_issued_mask(ci, CEPH_CAP_XATTR_SHARED, 1))) {
>> +	      __ceph_caps_issued_mask_metric(ci, CEPH_CAP_XATTR_SHARED, 1))) {
>>   		spin_unlock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
>>   
>>   		/* security module gets xattr while filling trace */
>> @@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ ssize_t ceph_listxattr(struct dentry *dentry, char *names, size_t size)
>>   	     ci->i_xattrs.version, ci->i_xattrs.index_version);
>>   
>>   	if (ci->i_xattrs.version == 0 ||
>> -	    !__ceph_caps_issued_mask(ci, CEPH_CAP_XATTR_SHARED, 1)) {
>> +	    !__ceph_caps_issued_mask_metric(ci, CEPH_CAP_XATTR_SHARED, 1)) {
>>   		spin_unlock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
>>   		err = ceph_do_getattr(inode, CEPH_STAT_CAP_XATTR, true);
>>   		if (err)

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-22  1:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-21  7:05 [PATCH v8 0/5] ceph: add perf metrics support xiubli
2020-02-21  7:05 ` [PATCH v8 1/5] ceph: add global dentry lease metric support xiubli
2020-02-21  7:05 ` [PATCH v8 2/5] ceph: add caps perf metric for each session xiubli
2020-02-21 12:00   ` Jeff Layton
2020-02-22  1:51     ` Xiubo Li [this message]
2020-02-26  3:05       ` Jeff Layton
2020-02-21  7:05 ` [PATCH v8 3/5] ceph: add global read latency metric support xiubli
2020-02-21  7:05 ` [PATCH v8 4/5] ceph: add global write " xiubli
2020-02-21  7:05 ` [PATCH v8 5/5] ceph: add global metadata perf " xiubli
2020-02-21 12:03   ` Jeff Layton
2020-02-21 14:56     ` Ilya Dryomov
2020-02-22  1:20       ` Xiubo Li
2020-02-22  1:36         ` Xiubo Li
2020-02-24  9:56         ` Ilya Dryomov
2020-02-24 10:20           ` Xiubo Li
2020-02-22  1:09     ` Xiubo Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ff394699-2de4-c3ba-9b11-0730acf7d4df@redhat.com \
    --to=xiubli@redhat.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=pdonnell@redhat.com \
    --cc=sage@redhat.com \
    --cc=zyan@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox