CEPH filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Madhusudhana U <madhusudhana.u.acharya@gmail.com>
To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: SAS disks for OSD's
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:56:24 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20120423T175101-19@post.gmane.org> (raw)

Hi all,
Is any performance benefit we will get using SAS storage for OSD instead of 
SATA storage ? Is any one using SAS drives which is producing good performance? 

Or I can use SAS drives for journal and SATA storage for OSD? 

Which one in above two scenario would yield a better performance?

I would like to test above scenarios, before i would like to hear if
anyone got good results with SAS drives.

Thanks
__M


             reply	other threads:[~2012-04-23 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-23 15:56 Madhusudhana U [this message]
2012-04-23 19:22 ` SAS disks for OSD's Stefan Kleijkers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=loom.20120423T175101-19@post.gmane.org \
    --to=madhusudhana.u.acharya@gmail.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox