From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Oliva Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] EC backfill retries Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 12:16:26 -0300 Message-ID: References: <06c85dc1-3318-fc05-ec1a-7f68d3aecc37@redhat.com> <52362dc8-faca-82f4-b1ac-dc7df6150afe@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from linux-libre.fsfla.org ([208.118.235.54]:35997 "EHLO linux-libre.fsfla.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933873AbdDGPQh (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:16:37 -0400 Received: from freie.home (home.lxoliva.fsfla.org [172.31.160.164]) by linux-libre.fsfla.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id v37FGXRT005249 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 15:16:34 GMT In-Reply-To: (Alexandre Oliva's message of "Thu, 16 Mar 2017 14:44:17 -0300") Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Zafman Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org On Mar 16, 2017, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Mar 15, 2017, David Zafman wrote: >> If it applies cleanly > It did when I created it. And the 3 patches applied cleanly as I prepared to build my patched 10.2.6, so I can't imagine why they would have conflicted for you. Are you sure you were trying to apply them to the jewel branch? > According to my logs, the commits I cherry-picked, that I referenced by > issue, were: > 82f5cc63404ce9f680d714fc85148946f2b2c376 (your patch for 13937) > (cherry picked from commit c51d70e1e837c972e42ddd5fa66f7ca4477b95cc) > b3224a18f6acc7ed54c2162b140a33b6146a16be (Kefu Chai's patch for 17857) -- Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/ You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member Free Software Evangelist|Red Hat Brasil GNU Toolchain Engineer