From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-ioprio: Introduce promote-to-rt policy Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 09:10:26 -0800 Message-ID: <0290f608-6ddf-ecb7-4c05-55b0f7dbfbea@acm.org> References: <20230201045227.2203123-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com> <8c068af3-7199-11cf-5c69-a523c7c22d9a@acm.org> <4f7dcb3e-2d5a-cae3-0e1c-a82bcc3d2217@huaweicloud.com> <20230208134345.77bdep3kzp52haxu@quack3> <7fcd4c38-ccbe-6411-e424-a57595ad9c0b@acm.org> <20230209085603.dzqfcc3pp4hacqlz@quack3> <55a065e7-7d86-d58f-15ba-c631a427843e@acm.org> <20230210101244.zsmtmsoo4xjx7suj@quack3> <48620099-0311-e752-ba3b-cbb4351cf81e@huaweicloud.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <48620099-0311-e752-ba3b-cbb4351cf81e@huaweicloud.com> List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Hou Tao , Jan Kara Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Zefan Li , Johannes Weiner , Jonathan Corbet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, houtao1@huawei.com On 2/13/23 04:51, Hou Tao wrote: > Should I keep "none-to-rt" and make it work just like "promote-to-rt" or should > I just remove "none-to-rt" and add "promote-to-rt" ? I think the latter will be > more appropriate. Removing none-to-rt would break existing systems that use this policy. I prefer the former solution. Thanks, Bart.