public inbox for cgroups@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>,
	tj@kernel.org, lizefan.x@bytedance.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	adityakali@google.com, sergeh@kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: fix panic caused by partcmd_update
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 22:34:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ba00b7c-5292-4242-b648-4ca8d4a457c6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240730015316.2324188-1-chenridong@huawei.com>

On 7/29/24 21:53, Chen Ridong wrote:
> We find a bug as below:
> BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000003
> PGD 0 P4D 0
> Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
> CPU: 3 PID: 358 Comm: bash Tainted: G        W I        6.6.0-10893-g60d6
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/4
> RIP: 0010:partition_sched_domains_locked+0x483/0x600
> Code: 01 48 85 d2 74 0d 48 83 05 29 3f f8 03 01 f3 48 0f bc c2 89 c0 48 9
> RSP: 0018:ffffc90000fdbc58 EFLAGS: 00000202
> RAX: 0000000100000003 RBX: ffff888100b3dfa0 RCX: 0000000000000000
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 000000000002fe80
> RBP: ffff888100b3dfb0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: ffffc90000fdbcb0 R11: 0000000000000004 R12: 0000000000000002
> R13: ffff888100a92b48 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> FS:  00007f44a5425740(0000) GS:ffff888237d80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 0000000100030973 CR3: 000000010722c000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> Call Trace:
>   <TASK>
>   ? show_regs+0x8c/0xa0
>   ? __die_body+0x23/0xa0
>   ? __die+0x3a/0x50
>   ? page_fault_oops+0x1d2/0x5c0
>   ? partition_sched_domains_locked+0x483/0x600
>   ? search_module_extables+0x2a/0xb0
>   ? search_exception_tables+0x67/0x90
>   ? kernelmode_fixup_or_oops+0x144/0x1b0
>   ? __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x211/0x360
>   ? up_read+0x3b/0x50
>   ? bad_area_nosemaphore+0x1a/0x30
>   ? exc_page_fault+0x890/0xd90
>   ? __lock_acquire.constprop.0+0x24f/0x8d0
>   ? __lock_acquire.constprop.0+0x24f/0x8d0
>   ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30
>   ? partition_sched_domains_locked+0x483/0x600
>   ? partition_sched_domains_locked+0xf0/0x600
>   rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x806/0xdc0
>   update_partition_sd_lb+0x118/0x130
>   cpuset_write_resmask+0xffc/0x1420
>   cgroup_file_write+0xb2/0x290
>   kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x194/0x290
>   new_sync_write+0xeb/0x160
>   vfs_write+0x16f/0x1d0
>   ksys_write+0x81/0x180
>   __x64_sys_write+0x21/0x30
>   x64_sys_call+0x2f25/0x4630
>   do_syscall_64+0x44/0xb0
>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x78/0xe2
> RIP: 0033:0x7f44a553c887
>
> It can be reproduced with cammands:
> cd /sys/fs/cgroup/
> mkdir test
> cd test/
> echo +cpuset > ../cgroup.subtree_control
> echo root > cpuset.cpus.partition
> echo 0-3 > cpuset.cpus // 3 is nproc
What do you mean by "3 is nproc"? Are there only 3 CPUs in the system? 
What are the value of /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset.cpu*?
>
> This issue is caused by the incorrect rebuilding of scheduling domains.
> In this scenario, test/cpuset.cpus.partition should be an invalid root
> and should not trigger the rebuilding of scheduling domains. When calling
> update_parent_effective_cpumask with partcmd_update, if newmask is not
> null, it should recheck newmask whether there are cpus is available
> for parect/cs that has tasks.
>
> Fixes: 0c7f293efc87 ("cgroup/cpuset: Add cpuset.cpus.exclusive.effective for v2")
> Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
> ---
>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 40ec4abaf440..a9b6d56eeffa 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -1991,6 +1991,8 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
>   			part_error = PERR_CPUSEMPTY;
>   			goto write_error;
>   		}
> +		/* Check newmask again, whether cpus are available for parent/cs */
> +		nocpu |= tasks_nocpu_error(parent, cs, newmask);
>   
>   		/*
>   		 * partcmd_update with newmask:

The code change looks reasonable to me. However, I would like to know 
more about the reproduction steps.

Cheers,
Longman


  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-30  2:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-30  1:53 [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: fix panic caused by partcmd_update Chen Ridong
2024-07-30  2:34 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2024-07-30  2:55   ` chenridong
2024-07-30  3:15     ` Waiman Long
2024-07-30  3:46       ` chenridong
2024-07-30  3:48         ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0ba00b7c-5292-4242-b648-4ca8d4a457c6@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=adityakali@google.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
    --cc=sergeh@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox