Linux cgroups development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
To: "Harry Yoo (Oracle)" <harry@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] mm/memcontrol: do not drain objcg stock when spinning is not allowed
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 16:30:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <104794ff-9f04-48be-91e8-89d5d2269f95@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260624-kmalloc-nolock-fixes-v1-1-fdf4d17351dd@kernel.org>

On 6/24/26 15:11, Harry Yoo (Oracle) wrote:
> When kmalloc_nolock() drains objcg stock, the stock might be holding
> the last reference to the objcg. Since obj_cgroup_release() is a
> callback for percpu refcount and does not know whether spinning is
> allowed, it is not safe to invoke obj_cgroup_put().
> 
> This was caught by lockdep on PREEMPT_RT because acquiring
> a sleeping lock (objcg_lock) violates lock nesting rules:
> 
>   kernel: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48
>   kernel: in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1267, name: systemd-resolve
>   preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
>   RCU nest depth: 3, expected: 3
>   6 locks held by systemd-resolve/1267:
>    #0: ffff888a8165fa20 ((&pcs->lock)){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x185/0xa20
>    #1: ffffffff9658a4c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rt_spin_trylock+0x74/0x2a0
>    #2: ffff888a81648598 ((lock)#4){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: trylock_stock+0x118/0x380
>    #3: ffffffff9658a4c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rt_spin_trylock+0x74/0x2a0
>    #4: ffffffff9658a4c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: percpu_ref_put_many.constprop.0+0x40/0x270
>    #5: ffffffff96af11d8 (objcg_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: obj_cgroup_release+0x8a/0x410
>   [...]
>   Call Trace:
>    <TASK>
>    dump_stack_lvl+0x8a/0xe0
>    dump_stack+0x14/0x1c
>    __might_resched.cold+0x233/0x2bb
>    rt_spin_lock+0xd3/0x410
>    obj_cgroup_release+0x8a/0x410
>    percpu_ref_put_many.constprop.0+0x226/0x270
>    drain_obj_stock_slot+0x27e/0x8d0
>    __refill_obj_stock+0x409/0x6d0
>    __memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook+0xa45/0x1500
>    __kmalloc_nolock_noprof+0x988/0xc40
>    [...]
> 
> However, this is illegal in !RT kernels too because the objcg release
> callback acquires a spinlock even when spinning is not allowed.
> 
> To fix this issue, fall back to atomics when the cached objcg doesn't
> match, but it is unsafe to drain because spinning is not allowed.
> 
> This is expected to affect performance of kmalloc_nolock() since
> it can no longer drain and refill the stock and falls back to a
> per-objcg atomic counter (objcg->nr_charged_bytes).

Maybe it's not bad that the constrained operation will not do a drain? Could
we say it's likely that both _nolock() and normal operations will likely be
happening on the same cpu for the same memcg, so a normal one will soon
handle it?

> Fixes: af92793e52c3 ("slab: Introduce kmalloc_nolock() and kfree_nolock().")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Harry Yoo (Oracle) <harry@kernel.org>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  mm/slab.h       |  3 ++-
>  mm/slub.c       | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
>  3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 29390ba13baa..5bb5e75ef5b0 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -3316,18 +3316,19 @@ static bool obj_stock_flush_required(struct obj_stock_pcp *stock,
>  static void __refill_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
>  			       struct obj_stock_pcp *stock,
>  			       unsigned int nr_bytes,
> -			       bool allow_uncharge)
> +			       bool allow_uncharge,
> +			       bool allow_spin)
>  {
>  	unsigned int nr_pages = 0;
>  
> -	if (!stock) {
> -		nr_pages = nr_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> -		nr_bytes = nr_bytes & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> -		atomic_add(nr_bytes, &objcg->nr_charged_bytes);
> -		goto out;
> -	}
> +	if (!stock)
> +		goto fallback;
>  
>  	if (READ_ONCE(stock->cached_objcg) != objcg) { /* reset if necessary */
> +		/* Not safe to drain since objcg release acquires spinlock */
> +		if (unlikely(!allow_spin))
> +			goto fallback;
> +
>  		drain_obj_stock(stock);
>  		obj_cgroup_get(objcg);
>  		stock->nr_bytes = atomic_read(&objcg->nr_charged_bytes)
> @@ -3346,6 +3347,13 @@ static void __refill_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
>  out:
>  	if (nr_pages)
>  		obj_cgroup_uncharge_pages(objcg, nr_pages);
> +	return;
> +
> +fallback:
> +	nr_pages = nr_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	nr_bytes = nr_bytes & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> +	atomic_add(nr_bytes, &objcg->nr_charged_bytes);
> +	goto out;
>  }
>  
>  static void refill_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
> @@ -3353,7 +3361,8 @@ static void refill_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
>  			     bool allow_uncharge)
>  {
>  	struct obj_stock_pcp *stock = trylock_stock();
> -	__refill_obj_stock(objcg, stock, nr_bytes, allow_uncharge);
> +	__refill_obj_stock(objcg, stock, nr_bytes, allow_uncharge,
> +			   /* allow_spin = */ true);
>  	unlock_stock(stock);
>  }
>  
> @@ -3428,6 +3437,7 @@ bool __memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list_lru *lru,
>  				  size_t size, void **p)
>  {
>  	size_t obj_size = obj_full_size(s);
> +	bool allow_spin = alloc_flags_allow_spinning(slab_alloc_flags);
>  	struct obj_cgroup *objcg;
>  	struct slab *slab;
>  	unsigned long off;
> @@ -3497,7 +3507,8 @@ bool __memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list_lru *lru,
>  				return false;
>  			stock = trylock_stock();
>  			if (remainder)
> -				__refill_obj_stock(objcg, stock, remainder, false);
> +				__refill_obj_stock(objcg, stock, remainder, false,
> +						   allow_spin);
>  		}
>  		__account_obj_stock(objcg, stock, obj_size,
>  				    slab_pgdat(slab), cache_vmstat_idx(s));
> @@ -3516,7 +3527,8 @@ bool __memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list_lru *lru,
>  }
>  
>  void __memcg_slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> -			    void **p, int objects, unsigned long obj_exts)
> +			    void **p, int objects, unsigned long obj_exts,
> +			    bool allow_spin)
>  {
>  	size_t obj_size = obj_full_size(s);
>  
> @@ -3535,7 +3547,7 @@ void __memcg_slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
>  		obj_ext->objcg = NULL;
>  
>  		stock = trylock_stock();
> -		__refill_obj_stock(objcg, stock, obj_size, true);
> +		__refill_obj_stock(objcg, stock, obj_size, true, allow_spin);
>  		__account_obj_stock(objcg, stock, -obj_size,
>  				    slab_pgdat(slab), cache_vmstat_idx(s));
>  		unlock_stock(stock);
> diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
> index 281a65233795..a6b4ac298d08 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.h
> +++ b/mm/slab.h
> @@ -660,7 +660,8 @@ bool __memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list_lru *lru,
>  				  gfp_t flags, unsigned int slab_alloc_flags,
>  				  size_t size, void **p);
>  void __memcg_slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> -			    void **p, int objects, unsigned long obj_exts);
> +			    void **p, int objects, unsigned long obj_exts,
> +			    bool allow_spin);
>  #endif
>  
>  void kvfree_rcu_cb(struct rcu_head *head);
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 917635203f73..32672a92581b 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2488,7 +2488,7 @@ bool memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags,
>  
>  static __fastpath_inline
>  void memcg_slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab, void **p,
> -			  int objects)
> +			  int objects, bool allow_spin)
>  {
>  	unsigned long obj_exts;
>  
> @@ -2500,7 +2500,7 @@ void memcg_slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab, void **p,
>  		return;
>  
>  	get_slab_obj_exts(obj_exts);
> -	__memcg_slab_free_hook(s, slab, p, objects, obj_exts);
> +	__memcg_slab_free_hook(s, slab, p, objects, obj_exts, allow_spin);
>  	put_slab_obj_exts(obj_exts);
>  }
>  
> @@ -2575,7 +2575,7 @@ static inline bool memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s,
>  }
>  
>  static inline void memcg_slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> -					void **p, int objects)
> +					void **p, int objects, bool allow_spin)
>  {
>  }
>  
> @@ -2946,11 +2946,12 @@ static bool __rcu_free_sheaf_prepare(struct kmem_cache *s,
>  	void **p = &sheaf->objects[0];
>  	unsigned int i = 0;
>  	bool pfmemalloc = false;
> +	bool allow_spin = true;
>  
>  	while (i < sheaf->size) {
>  		struct slab *slab = virt_to_slab(p[i]);
>  
> -		memcg_slab_free_hook(s, slab, p + i, 1);
> +		memcg_slab_free_hook(s, slab, p + i, 1, allow_spin);
>  		alloc_tagging_slab_free_hook(s, slab, p + i, 1);
>  
>  		if (unlikely(!slab_free_hook(s, p[i], init, true))) {
> @@ -6215,12 +6216,13 @@ static void free_to_pcs_bulk(struct kmem_cache *s, size_t size, void **p)
>  	struct node_barn *barn;
>  	void *remote_objects[PCS_BATCH_MAX];
>  	unsigned int remote_nr = 0;
> +	bool allow_spin = true;
>  
>  next_remote_batch:
>  	while (i < size) {
>  		struct slab *slab = virt_to_slab(p[i]);
>  
> -		memcg_slab_free_hook(s, slab, p + i, 1);
> +		memcg_slab_free_hook(s, slab, p + i, 1, allow_spin);
>  		alloc_tagging_slab_free_hook(s, slab, p + i, 1);
>  
>  		if (unlikely(!slab_free_hook(s, p[i], init, false))) {
> @@ -6398,13 +6400,16 @@ static __fastpath_inline
>  void slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab, void *object,
>  	       unsigned long addr)
>  {
> -	memcg_slab_free_hook(s, slab, &object, 1);
> +	bool allow_spin = true;
> +
> +	memcg_slab_free_hook(s, slab, &object, 1, allow_spin);
>  	alloc_tagging_slab_free_hook(s, slab, &object, 1);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(!slab_free_hook(s, object, slab_want_init_on_free(s), false)))
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (likely(can_free_to_pcs(slab)) && likely(free_to_pcs(s, object, true)))
> +	if (likely(can_free_to_pcs(slab)) &&
> +			likely(free_to_pcs(s, object, allow_spin)))
>  		return;
>  
>  	__slab_free(s, slab, object, object, 1, addr);
> @@ -6429,7 +6434,9 @@ static __fastpath_inline
>  void slab_free_bulk(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab, void *head,
>  		    void *tail, void **p, int cnt, unsigned long addr)
>  {
> -	memcg_slab_free_hook(s, slab, p, cnt);
> +	bool allow_spin = true;
> +
> +	memcg_slab_free_hook(s, slab, p, cnt, allow_spin);
>  	alloc_tagging_slab_free_hook(s, slab, p, cnt);
>  	/*
>  	 * With KASAN enabled slab_free_freelist_hook modifies the freelist
> @@ -6734,6 +6741,7 @@ void kfree_nolock(const void *object)
>  	struct slab *slab;
>  	struct kmem_cache *s;
>  	void *x = (void *)object;
> +	bool allow_spin = false;
>  
>  	if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(object)))
>  		return;
> @@ -6746,7 +6754,7 @@ void kfree_nolock(const void *object)
>  
>  	s = slab->slab_cache;
>  
> -	memcg_slab_free_hook(s, slab, &x, 1);
> +	memcg_slab_free_hook(s, slab, &x, 1, allow_spin);
>  	alloc_tagging_slab_free_hook(s, slab, &x, 1);
>  	/*
>  	 * Unlike slab_free() do NOT call the following:
> @@ -6776,7 +6784,8 @@ void kfree_nolock(const void *object)
>  	 */
>  	kasan_slab_free(s, x, false, false, /* skip quarantine */true);
>  
> -	if (likely(can_free_to_pcs(slab)) && likely(free_to_pcs(s, x, false)))
> +	if (likely(can_free_to_pcs(slab)) &&
> +			likely(free_to_pcs(s, x, allow_spin)))
>  		return;
>  
>  	/*
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-26 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-24 13:11 [PATCH RFC 0/4] memcg,slab: kmalloc_nolock() fixes Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-24 13:11 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] mm/memcontrol: do not drain objcg stock when spinning is not allowed Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-26 14:30   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) [this message]
2026-06-24 13:11 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] mm/slab: handle allow_spin in slab_free_hook() instead of open coding Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-26 14:41   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-24 13:11 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] mm/slab: fix a deadlock in memcg_alloc_abort_single() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-26 14:57   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-24 13:11 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] mm/slab: serialize defer_free_barrier() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-26 15:00   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-24 16:30 ` [PATCH RFC 0/4] memcg,slab: kmalloc_nolock() fixes Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-24 20:19   ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-26 15:09     ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-26  6:04 ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-26 15:10   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=104794ff-9f04-48be-91e8-89d5d2269f95@kernel.org \
    --to=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox