From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [RFD] cgroup: about multiple hierarchies Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 11:15:34 +0100 Message-ID: <1330683334.11248.215.camel@twins> References: <20120221211938.GE12236@google.com> <20120222163858.GB4128@redhat.com> <20120222165714.GC4128@redhat.com> <1329990094.24994.64.camel@twins> <1330006399.11248.20.camel@twins> <4F4FAF89.3090706@redhat.com> <1330633603.7414.49.camel@marge.simpson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Kay Sievers Cc: Mike Galbraith , Michal Schmidt , Vivek Goyal , Tejun Heo , Li Zefan , containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Andrew Morton , Lennart Poettering , Frederic Weisbecker , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Christoph Hellwig On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 03:43 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > It's ridiculous. systemd in a nutshell, well put! :-)