From: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org
Cc: ctalbott-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
rni-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH 06/11] blkcg: make sure blkg_lookup() returns %NULL if @q is bypassing
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:11:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334347895-6268-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334347895-6268-1-git-send-email-tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Currently, blkg_lookup() doesn't check @q bypass state. This patch
updates blk_queue_bypass_start() to do synchronize_rcu() before
returning and updates blkg_lookup() to check blk_queue_bypass() and
return %NULL if bypassing. This ensures blkg_lookup() returns %NULL
if @q is bypassing.
This is to guarantee that nobody is accessing policy data while @q is
bypassing, which is necessary to allow replacing blkio_cgroup->pd[] in
place on policy [de]activation.
v2: Added more comments explaining bypass guarantees as suggested by
Vivek.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
block/blk-cgroup.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
block/blk-core.c | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
index f6581a0..d6e4555 100644
--- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
+++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
@@ -137,6 +137,38 @@ static struct blkio_group *blkg_alloc(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
return blkg;
}
+static struct blkio_group *__blkg_lookup(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
+ struct request_queue *q)
+{
+ struct blkio_group *blkg;
+ struct hlist_node *n;
+
+ hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(blkg, n, &blkcg->blkg_list, blkcg_node)
+ if (blkg->q == q)
+ return blkg;
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+/**
+ * blkg_lookup - lookup blkg for the specified blkcg - q pair
+ * @blkcg: blkcg of interest
+ * @q: request_queue of interest
+ *
+ * Lookup blkg for the @blkcg - @q pair. This function should be called
+ * under RCU read lock and is guaranteed to return %NULL if @q is bypassing
+ * - see blk_queue_bypass_start() for details.
+ */
+struct blkio_group *blkg_lookup(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
+ struct request_queue *q)
+{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
+
+ if (unlikely(blk_queue_bypass(q)))
+ return NULL;
+ return __blkg_lookup(blkcg, q);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkg_lookup);
+
struct blkio_group *blkg_lookup_create(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
struct request_queue *q,
bool for_root)
@@ -150,13 +182,11 @@ struct blkio_group *blkg_lookup_create(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
/*
* This could be the first entry point of blkcg implementation and
* we shouldn't allow anything to go through for a bypassing queue.
- * The following can be removed if blkg lookup is guaranteed to
- * fail on a bypassing queue.
*/
if (unlikely(blk_queue_bypass(q)) && !for_root)
return ERR_PTR(blk_queue_dead(q) ? -EINVAL : -EBUSY);
- blkg = blkg_lookup(blkcg, q);
+ blkg = __blkg_lookup(blkcg, q);
if (blkg)
return blkg;
@@ -185,20 +215,6 @@ out:
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkg_lookup_create);
-/* called under rcu_read_lock(). */
-struct blkio_group *blkg_lookup(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
- struct request_queue *q)
-{
- struct blkio_group *blkg;
- struct hlist_node *n;
-
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(blkg, n, &blkcg->blkg_list, blkcg_node)
- if (blkg->q == q)
- return blkg;
- return NULL;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkg_lookup);
-
static void blkg_destroy(struct blkio_group *blkg)
{
struct request_queue *q = blkg->q;
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 991c1d6..a4b3eaf 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -416,7 +416,8 @@ void blk_drain_queue(struct request_queue *q, bool drain_all)
* In bypass mode, only the dispatch FIFO queue of @q is used. This
* function makes @q enter bypass mode and drains all requests which were
* throttled or issued before. On return, it's guaranteed that no request
- * is being throttled or has ELVPRIV set.
+ * is being throttled or has ELVPRIV set and blk_queue_bypass() %true
+ * inside queue or RCU read lock.
*/
void blk_queue_bypass_start(struct request_queue *q)
{
@@ -426,6 +427,8 @@ void blk_queue_bypass_start(struct request_queue *q)
spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
blk_drain_queue(q, false);
+ /* ensure blk_queue_bypass() is %true inside RCU read lock */
+ synchronize_rcu();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_queue_bypass_start);
--
1.7.7.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-13 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-13 20:11 [PATCHSET] block: per-queue policy activation, take#2 Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 05/11] blkcg: make blkg_conf_prep() take @pol and return with queue lock held Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 08/11] blkcg: add request_queue->root_blkg Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <1334347895-6268-1-git-send-email-tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 01/11] cfq: fix build breakage & warnings Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 02/11] blkcg: kill blkio_list and replace blkio_list_lock with a mutex Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 03/11] blkcg: use @pol instead of @plid in update_root_blkg_pd() and blkcg_print_blkgs() Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 04/11] blkcg: remove static policy ID enums Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
[not found] ` <1334347895-6268-7-git-send-email-tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-13 21:50 ` [PATCH UPDATED 06/11] blkcg: make sure blkg_lookup() returns %NULL if @q is bypassing Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 07/11] blkcg: make request_queue bypassing on allocation Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <1334347895-6268-8-git-send-email-tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-13 20:32 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <20120413203205.GI26383-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-13 20:37 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20120413203726.GE12233-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-13 20:44 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <20120413204446.GK26383-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-13 20:47 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20120413204710.GF12233-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-13 20:55 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <20120413205501.GL26383-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-13 21:05 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20120413210548.GG12233-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-13 21:16 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20120413211640.GH12233-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-13 21:31 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-17 12:04 ` James Bottomley
2012-04-18 21:42 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:33 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <20120413213344.GA1825-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-13 21:38 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20120413213852.GJ12233-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-16 12:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 20:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 09/11] blkcg: implement per-queue policy activation Tejun Heo
2012-04-20 8:09 ` [PATCHSET] block: per-queue policy activation, take#2 Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20120420080943.GG7505-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-20 12:02 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <4F91503D.2060402-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-20 17:17 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20120420171742.GC32324-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-20 19:08 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <4F91B433.2070209-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-25 18:19 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 10/11] blkcg: drop stuff unused after per-queue policy activation update Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 11/11] blkcg: shoot down blkgs if all policies are deactivated Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1334347895-6268-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj-dgejt+ai2ygdnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ctalbott-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rni-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).