From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: cgroup: status-quo and userland efforts Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 08:00:04 +0200 Message-ID: <1372399204.5989.166.camel@marge.simpson.net> References: <20130625000118.GT1918@mtj.dyndns.org> <20130626212047.GB4536@htj.dyndns.org> <1372311907.5871.78.camel@marge.simpson.net> <20130627180143.GD5599@mtj.dyndns.org> <1372391198.5989.110.camel@marge.simpson.net> <20130628040930.GC2500@htj.dyndns.org> <1372394950.5989.128.camel@marge.simpson.net> <20130628050138.GD2500@htj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130628050138.GD2500-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Tim Hockin , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Containers , Kay Sievers , lpoetter , workman-devel , jpoimboe , "dhaval.giani" , Cgroups On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 22:01 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > Anyways, if you're root, you can keep doing whatever you want. You > could be stepping on the centralized agent's toes a bit and vice-versa Keep on truckn' sounds good, that vice-versa toe stomping not so good, but yeah, until systemd or ilk grows the ability to shut me down, I shouldn't feel any burning need to introduce it to my machete. > but I don't think that's gonna be disastrous. What I'm trying to > stamp out is direct usages from !root domains and !system-management > binaries / scripts. They absolutely have to go. There's no question > about it and I'll take totalitarian userland agent anyday over the > current mess. I get some of the why.. and yeah, it's the dirt simple usage that I care about most, not the big hairy problem cases you're trying to address. > Eventually, I think we'll be able to reach an equilibrium where most > things are reasonable and we'll be exploring the acceptable limits of > flexibility again, but right now, please bear with the brutality. > We're way over the line and I can't see a way back which isn't gonna > sting a bit. I'm and will keep trying to make it as painless as > possible. Keep on driving, and thanks for listening. Aaaooooo ;-) -Mike