From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: Implement interface for cgroup unified hierarchy Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 06:36:07 +0200 Message-ID: <1445661367.3218.62.camel@gmail.com> References: <20150824213600.GK28944@mtj.duckdns.org> <20150824221935.GN28944@mtj.duckdns.org> <20150825210234.GE26785@mtj.duckdns.org> <20150912144007.GA8942@htj.duckdns.org> <20151001184629.GB26498@mtj.duckdns.org> <20151023222110.GA4390@mtj.duckdns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QG6GyMrFY+NhzKOYiMktqjTITQnV6n768MIoJOzFgjM=; b=uA7anNm7EGeS0Mb8unZZljyfWPvMcKQN11I2hGtaanfj8NWZufBqA0ZKnQgVOyRceI 4Ed17mSIcwrxsgIQNDwZ8ng6Tc6VXC5rRAz+tCB/nQ4/PLceZPFRYZJ4wxbneIrXjzoz IAupj5oLVOLTYbm91Aoc6hNzeYZRNWc2W/fm03K3f0VZu8MQHgdMgORoN4ddVJk0OxX+ v2dS4oYr8yIGAJ6FyJG0WZuguqDDA5Yj10m9GA09283vYjTOKfwxbT1bwEKmeuaLJmtc QywVbGv8t1upmCEJ7Y34bc1fesSy+kvjl+NouxmZRK/+wCQcMnU1+BYC48Yk9MsVLjOe FNWA== In-Reply-To: <20151023222110.GA4390@mtj.duckdns.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Tejun Heo Cc: Paul Turner , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Johannes Weiner , lizefan@huawei.com, cgroups , LKML , kernel-team , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton On Sat, 2015-10-24 at 07:21 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > It'd be a step back in usability only for users who have been using > cgroups in fringing ways which can't be justified for ratification and > we do want to actively filter those out. Of all the cgroup signal currently in existence, seems the Google signal has to have the most volume under the curve by a mile. If you were to filter that signal out, what remained would be a flat line of noise. -Mike