From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [PATCHSET RFC cgroup/for-4.6] cgroup, sched: implement resource group and PRIO_RGRP Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 10:05:48 +0200 Message-ID: <1460016348.4080.26.camel@gmail.com> References: <1457710888-31182-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20160314113013.GM6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160406155830.GI24661@htj.duckdns.org> <20160407064549.GH3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160407073547.GA12560@cmpxchg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lBMUn+o7OME/D8nKcmSXLPjdElR34iCFXMU5IiYPdeo=; b=1FV2cBNeC9QwExhK3aL31BBsmhtyXldLozC7H0hobH8lKK1bqW36Dbmf6Y8F3U6tQl gRt+lsz9gYra+1/wyaiRPlFOQEZ+o2nNGa+4kjDWeqjKCChgqB7S/mzKYMGX3DDrDpaF dGu/FYcdqF09lHrUyKUgpFIYDchLy3uznbKQEjdC6K4y+n6YobOX50G6PvHWqBFMb9mP kiUpE2fLQhR61wBQP8GkL5edqDd2CJ1Om3A1JifG70xsnuc2BWbI/Z0Qn0jwGDnODPCX kaleDVxN7pzt8k5+6h5TsCwZ2e/muxYQS81NHm3eLEBCcAcKQ6mpsEUgiBlLb9R6fQRK /wmw== In-Reply-To: <20160407073547.GA12560-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Johannes Weiner , Peter Zijlstra Cc: Tejun Heo , torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, pjt-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kernel-team-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 03:35 -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 08:45:49AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > So I recently got made aware of the fact that cgroupv2 doesn't > > allow > > tasks to be associated with !leaf cgroups, this is yet another > > capability of cpu-cgroup you've destroyed. > > May I ask how you are using that? One real world usage is the thread pool servicing customers on a cgroup = account basis that I outlined. -Mike