Re: [PATCH 17/33] cpuset: Propagate cpuset isolation update to workqueue through housekeeping

[Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>]

On 8/29/25 11:47 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> --- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_test_cpu);
>   int housekeeping_update(struct cpumask *mask, enum hk_type type)
>   {
>   	struct cpumask *trial, *old = NULL;
> +	int err;
>   
>   	if (type != HK_TYPE_DOMAIN)
>   		return -ENOTSUPP;
> @@ -126,10 +127,11 @@ int housekeeping_update(struct cpumask *mask, enum hk_type type)
>   
>   	mem_cgroup_flush_workqueue();
>   	vmstat_flush_workqueue();
> +	err = workqueue_unbound_exclude_cpumask(housekeeping_cpumask(type));
>   
>   	kfree(old);
>   
> -	return 0;
> +	return err;
>   }

Actually workqueue_unbound_exclude_cpumask() expects a cpumask of all 
the CPUs that have been isolated. IOW, all the CPUs that are not in 
housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN). So we do the inversion here or we 
rename the function to, e.g. workqueue_unbound_cpumask_update() and make 
the change there.

Cheers,
Longman