From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] make 'none' field a flag Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 07:41:08 -0800 Message-ID: <20111213154108.GF25802@google.com> References: <1323614738-7405-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1323614738-7405-5-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=jEkUhds+wT0sBeRTnZ+dapQxwNMEJ4qpcUUjcRjBEgg=; b=ZXj4G0bL4lHEDWf7IFiiZ7gHC6Mlrj+3cT5dtz/33kC2c2W0WTYX4Z+gCuwcj/4QFK ltV35vR+grostUD7JDYO4nOSZBMl2bLO3ph6PP2HqjG0g0W+KB4FUYmTV8gp8v7VJA/G KF136Vf6sH/aJUIsnbCZJVyfmKODyQ/sJHQNE= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1323614738-7405-5-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Glauber Costa Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, jbottomley-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, bsingharora-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 03:45:38PM +0100, Glauber Costa wrote: > There is no reason to have a flags field, and then a separate > bool field just to indicate if 'none' subsystem were explicitly > requested. > > Make it a flag > > Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa Same as the previous patch. Doesn't this change how remount conditions are checked? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html