From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] memcg: kmem controller infrastructure Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:08:05 -0700 Message-ID: <20120626180805.GQ3869@google.com> References: <1340633728-12785-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1340633728-12785-7-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <20120625161720.ae13ae90.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4FE9CEBB.80108@parallels.com> <20120626110142.b7cf6d7c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=o1TDPAvWm66AGXw1dBR4f/Ldm73v9FaLs7Zg50ogPuM=; b=uTmR5vpOoqe1TsKbGm8xf387GwBYTPf1U/YvWsQzWd4VltUEeC202lnxmhy8WYEQkP c0uFg6apJRoV6k8f6R61OGZW3mZUsOdXG8SMUiqwBr1oOqUYY6UIBvAjEeeFbvwDvX0e /Kt6swL6GiCKz/if8lIlbu8lpNLzfj2I5mq/7O2p+ZW/xoPLsXpmMZhLSynJAa8id7Gv 4eidercFue7itd4UJQJXvmHz6hwMhPmFKKgbD9iWKAec3rNCfUXGuILfsx3hyICeYH66 XsROPqSCRe0YH9MYIsdF67thQ6YSk+Bif1SgjkTrdqZ1HA9jAGvlfbSaPAT7oDpBUljQ ntGg== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120626110142.b7cf6d7c.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andrew Morton Cc: Glauber Costa , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Frederic Weisbecker , David Rientjes , Pekka Enberg , Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , Christoph Lameter , devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org, Pekka Enberg On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:01:42AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:01:15 +0400 Glauber Costa wrote: > > > On 06/26/2012 03:17 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > >> + memcg_uncharge_kmem(memcg, size); > > >> >+ mem_cgroup_put(memcg); > > >> >+} > > >> >+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__mem_cgroup_free_kmem_page); > > >> > #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM */ > > >> > > > >> > #if defined(CONFIG_INET) && defined(CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM) > > >> >@@ -5645,3 +5751,69 @@ static int __init enable_swap_account(char *s) > > >> > __setup("swapaccount=", enable_swap_account); > > >> > > > >> > #endif > > >> >+ > > >> >+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM > > > gargh. CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM, please! > > > > > > > Here too. I like it as much as you do. > > > > But that is consistent with the rest of the file, and I'd rather have > > it this way. > > There's not much point in being consistent with something which is so > unpleasant. I'm on a little campaign to rename > CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR to CONFIG_MEMCG, only nobody has taken my > bait yet. Be first! +1. Block cgroup recently did blkio / blkiocg / blkio_cgroup -> blkcg. Join the cool crowd! :P -- tejun