Re: [PATCH v4 cgroup/for-3.7] cgroup: mark subsystems with broken hierarchy support and whine if cgroups are nested for them

[Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>]

On Tue 18-09-12 09:27:04, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Michal.
> 
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> The branch is based on top of the current mainline (fbcbe2b3c 3.6-rc5)
> >> and only contains hierarchy related changes.
> >
> > This is not very much mm git tree friendly because I would have to pull
> > a lot just to merge a single commit... It would have been much nicer if
> > you based it on the last major release (it applies cleanly on top of
> > 3.5). mm git tree tries to get as few (unrelated) changes as possible on
> > top of the last major release.
> 
> Hmmm... I thought you explicitly requested it to be based on -rc5.
> Maybe I misread... and yes I did. I read 3.5 as 3.6-rc5.

No problem.
 
> >> The branch will be kept stable unless I do something completely
> >> stupid, so please feel free to pull into other trees as necessary.
> >
> > Anyway, keep it this way for now (as we are getting close to the end of
> > 3.6). I have cherry-picked 8c7f6edb for now and use the branch after 3.6
> > is out.
> 
> It's single commit.  Rebasing is not a problem.

Let's keep it this way. Who knows who has already pulled.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs