From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/13] memcg: kmem controller infrastructure Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 07:11:51 +0900 Message-ID: <20121003221151.GC19248@localhost> References: <1347977050-29476-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1347977050-29476-7-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <20120926155108.GE15801@dhcp22.suse.cz> <5064392D.5040707@parallels.com> <20120927134432.GE29104@dhcp22.suse.cz> <50658B3B.9020303@parallels.com> <20120930082542.GH10383@mtj.dyndns.org> <5069542C.2020103@parallels.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=pfJmNvHyj/33G1wVszXazVVE3smc7iz9yA/WyZfnP3g=; b=lzEbvkHng0fpES63WypT4CgMD7HcixhfEGa5+CB7kIYZThlJUWKsUpKJ4sd6nNRajZ HOlf0B7gbQimoB1xmrDj6QuobZqxZIQe2czrdL9GT3nqpPRGuY9jp/tShcBQhuYaQjnk 7TwQHcGaItHUglguZonBv2Zt2RathWuXREVc8g5xhKaWGeM2zQ2LsVmy+2H1HWJzWMT6 mLRmGsVqI44Nw3lmb03fz27xEAjiMTBAhvXncHsh3zdEZ/yG6hDiCRKrxAWjqBl384+W Rgj93fx6LB6rswEsW4vP73J/x7853h7HWkbRDBb7Y0Itf0qcZ+UrMSq68RfPYae7FHaq SqEQ== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5069542C.2020103-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Glauber Costa Cc: Michal Hocko , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org, devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, Suleiman Souhlal , Frederic Weisbecker , Mel Gorman , David Rientjes , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , Johannes Weiner Hello, Glauber. Sorry about late replies. I'be been traveling for the Korean thanksgiving holidays. On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:28:28PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > > That synchronous ref draining is going away. Maybe we can do that > > before kmemcg? Michal, do you have some timeframe on mind? > > Since you said yourself in other points in this thread that you are fine > with some page references outliving the cgroup in the case of slab, this > is a situation that comes with the code, not a situation that was > incidentally there, and we're making use of. Hmmm? Not sure what you're trying to say but I wanted to say that this should be okay once the scheduled memcg pre_destroy change happens and nudge Michal once more. Thanks. -- tejun