From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aristeu Rozanski Subject: Re: [PATCH] device_cgroup: fix unchecked cgroup parent usage Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 09:28:38 -0400 Message-ID: <20121101132837.GE14789@redhat.com> References: <20121031160430.GD14789@redhat.com> <20121031163501.79a0950e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121031163501.79a0950e.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Tejun Heo , Li Zefan , James Morris , Pavel Emelyanov , Serge Hallyn , Jiri Slaby , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:35:01PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:04:30 -0400 > Aristeu Rozanski wrote: > > > In 4cef7299b4786879a3e113e84084a72b24590c5b the cgroup parent usage is > > unchecked. root will not have a parent and trying to use > > device.{allow,deny} will cause problems. > > From my reading of the code "problems" means "kernel null pointer > dereference". yes. you want me to resubmit it fixing it or you want to update it? > > static inline int may_allow_all(struct dev_cgroup *parent) > > offtopic: this function could quite neatly have a bool return type. ok, will do. > > { > > + if (!parent) > > + return 1; > > hm. Does it need a comment explaining what and why? I guess not... just. it's because the root's parent has to always allows full access to all devices. I can add a comment when I turn into a bool if you want. -- Aristeu