From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aristeu Rozanski Subject: Re: [PATCH] device_cgroup: lock assert fails in dev_exception_clean() Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:38:50 -0500 Message-ID: <20130123163849.GH17632@redhat.com> References: <1358460018-14717-1-git-send-email-jerry.snitselaar@oracle.com> <1358460018-14717-2-git-send-email-jerry.snitselaar@oracle.com> <20130117220642.GE16568@mtj.dyndns.org> <20130117231341.GA14588@cantor.us.oracle.com> <20130123043140.GA5913@cantor.us.oracle.com> <20130123142939.GC17632@redhat.com> <20130123163640.GB2373@mtj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130123163640.GB2373-9pTldWuhBndy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Tejun Heo Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Hi Tejun, On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 08:36:40AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 09:29:39AM -0500, Aristeu Rozanski wrote: > > Hi Jerry, > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:31:41PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: > > > The original patch I sent to James and lkml got pulled in to linus. Is > > > the correct thing to do here put the list cleanup code back in > > > devcgroup_css_free and drop the call to dev_exception_clean along with > > > change my patch made like this? > > > > I think this is what was suggested (not tested): > > Yeap. on a slightly subject, hierarchy support is still desired for device cgroups? I got the patchset ready by the time ebiederman submitted userns patches and like it was discussed before device_cgroup would be made obsolete once userns was out. -- Aristeu