From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aristeu Rozanski Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] devcg: refactor dev_exception_clean() Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:49:18 -0500 Message-ID: <20130130204917.GL17632@redhat.com> References: <20130130171101.060853036@napanee.usersys.redhat.com> <20130130171102.253395279@napanee.usersys.redhat.com> <20130130204730.GF8507@mail.hallyn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130130204730.GF8507-7LNsyQBKDXoIagZqoN9o3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Tejun Heo , Serge Hallyn On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 08:47:30PM +0000, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting aris-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org (aris-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org): > > - > > - if (rc) > > - return rc; > > Was this intentional? > > I see that you next add > > rc = propagate_behavior(devcgroup); > > right here, but this means you're ignoring failure in the > dev_exceptions_copy() call above. that's not intentional. thanks for catching this Tejun, you want me to resubmit the whole series or just the next patch (where I was supposed to move that chunk)? -- Aristeu