From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aristeu Rozanski Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] devcg: refactor dev_exception_clean() Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:13:32 -0500 Message-ID: <20130131151331.GM17632@redhat.com> References: <20130130171101.060853036@napanee.usersys.redhat.com> <20130130171102.253395279@napanee.usersys.redhat.com> <20130130204730.GF8507@mail.hallyn.com> <20130130204917.GL17632@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Tejun Heo Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Serge Hallyn On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:50:38PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Aristeu Rozanski > that's not > intentional. thanks for catching this > > > > Tejun, you want me to resubmit the whole series or just the next patch > > (where I was supposed to move that chunk)? > > If it doesn't affect the next patch, just posting an updated version > of this patch should be enough, I think. Which tree are these patches > planned to go through? the fix should actually happen on the next patch, not this one. and it seems I'll have to refresh it anyway (just had a glance on Serge's emails). -- Aristeu