From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Dave Jones <davej-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Linux Kernel
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Alexander Viro
<viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>,
cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] do not abuse ->cred_guard_mutex in threadgroup_lock()
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 21:00:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130309200046.GA8149@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <513AE918.7020704-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On 03/09, Li Zefan wrote:
>
> We don't need both patches for 3.9, so we'll queue Oleg's fix for 3.9 and
> yours for 3.10?
Well. OK, please see 1/1 (compile tested only).
But I still like the patch from Tejun more... Except _perhaps_ my
patch is better for 3.9 just because it is simpler.
And. I still think that probably we can avoid thread_group_leader()
recheck-and-restart logic in attach_task_by_pid(). But even if this
is true (and thus we can revert the changes in de_thread), we should
do this on top of Tejun's patch.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-09 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20130306223657.GA7392@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20130306223657.GA7392-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-07 17:25 ` lockdep trace from prepare_bprm_creds Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-07 18:01 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20130307180139.GD29601-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-07 18:03 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20130307180332.GE29601-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-07 19:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
[not found] ` <20130307191242.GA18265-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-07 19:38 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20130307193820.GB3209-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-09 2:11 ` Li Zefan
[not found] ` <513A9A67.60909-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-09 3:29 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20130309032936.GT14556-9pTldWuhBndy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-09 7:47 ` Li Zefan
[not found] ` <513AE918.7020704-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-09 20:00 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-03-09 20:01 ` [PATCH 1/1] do not abuse ->cred_guard_mutex in threadgroup_lock() Oleg Nesterov
[not found] ` <20130309200106.GB8149-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-09 20:15 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-11 1:50 ` Li Zefan
[not found] ` <20130309200046.GA8149-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-21 16:21 ` [PATCH] " Oleg Nesterov
[not found] ` <20130321162138.GA21859-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-21 22:06 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20130321150626.a7934d989fb80d835fa92255-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-22 13:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-19 22:02 ` [PATCH cgroup/for-3.10] cgroup: make cgroup_mutex outer to threadgroup_lock Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20130319220246.GR3042-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-20 0:58 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-20 15:03 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20130320150351.GW3042-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-20 18:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
[not found] ` <20130320183523.GA29365-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-20 18:42 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <CAOS58YPxGXt+iq1GZ4hryqm1Z_p+r7eRRC7ruUDDd=LQrWtAxg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-21 16:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-07 18:21 ` lockdep trace from prepare_bprm_creds Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20130307182140.GF29601-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-07 18:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
[not found] ` <20130307183213.GA18022-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-07 19:33 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130309200046.GA8149@redhat.com \
--to=oleg-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=davej-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).