From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: [PATCH cgroup/for-3.10] cgroup: make cgroup_mutex outer to threadgroup_lock Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:17:27 +0100 Message-ID: <20130321161727.GA21760@redhat.com> References: <20130307191242.GA18265@redhat.com> <20130307193820.GB3209@htj.dyndns.org> <513A9A67.60909@huawei.com> <20130309032936.GT14556@mtj.dyndns.org> <513AE918.7020704@huawei.com> <20130319220246.GR3042@htj.dyndns.org> <514909A0.4030808@huawei.com> <20130320150351.GW3042@htj.dyndns.org> <20130320183523.GA29365@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Tejun Heo Cc: Li Zefan , Dave Jones , Linux Kernel , Alexander Viro , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On 03/20, Tejun Heo wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > then we need "do not abuse ->cred_guard_mutex in threadgroup_lock()" > > acked by you and Li. Please let me know if I should resend it. > > Yeah, we want that one regardless of this one. Please feel free to add > my Acked-by (if I hadn't acked already, that is). Yeah, you have already acked it, thanks > How should your > patch be routed? Through -mm? Well, this is the only method I know ;) So I am resending it to Andrew with your acks apllied. Oleg.