From: Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: fix memcg_cache_name() to use cgroup_name()
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:06:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130325090629.GN2154@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <514EAC41.5050700-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On Sun 24-03-13 15:33:21, Li Zefan wrote:
> >> Thanks for identifying and fixing this.
> >>
> >> Li is right. The cache name will live long, but this is because the
> >> slab/slub caches will strdup it internally. So the actual memcg
> >> allocation is short lived.
> >
> > OK, I have totally missed that. Sorry about the confusion. Then all the
> > churn around the allocation is pointless, no?
> > What about:
> > ---
> >>From 7ed7f53bb597e8cb40d9ac91ce16142fb60f1e93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:22:54 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] memcg: fix memcg_cache_name() to use cgroup_name()
> >
> > As cgroup supports rename, it's unsafe to dereference dentry->d_name
> > without proper vfs locks. Fix this by using cgroup_name() rather than
> > dentry directly.
> >
> > Also open code memcg_cache_name because it is called only from
> > kmem_cache_dup which frees the returned name right after
> > kmem_cache_create_memcg makes a copy of it. Such a short-lived
> > allocation doesn't make too much sense. So replace it by a static
> > buffer as kmem_cache_dup is called with memcg_cache_mutex.
> >
>
> I doubt it's a win to add 4K to kernel text size instead of adding
> a few extra lines of code... but it's up to you.
I will leave the decision to Glauber. The updated version which uses
kmalloc for the static buffer is bellow.
> > Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> > mm/memcontrol.c | 33 +++++++++++----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> ...
> > static struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache_dup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> > struct kmem_cache *s)
> > {
> > char *name;
> > struct kmem_cache *new;
> > + static char tmp_name[PAGE_SIZE];
> >
> > - name = memcg_cache_name(memcg, s);
> > - if (!name)
> > - return NULL;
> > + lockdep_assert_held(&memcg_cache_mutex);
> > +
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > + tmp_name = snprintf(tmp_name, sizeof(tmp_name), "%s(%d:%s)", s->name,
> > + memcg_cache_id(memcg), cgroup_name(memcg->css.cgroup));
>
> I guess you didn't turn on CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM?
dohh. Friday effect...
> snprintf() returns a int value.
[...]
---
From 6f5d4c08cde5c82ac9432608adf517916ab54634 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:04:02 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] memcg: fix memcg_cache_name() to use cgroup_name()
As cgroup supports rename, it's unsafe to dereference dentry->d_name
without proper vfs locks. Fix this by using cgroup_name() rather than
dentry directly.
Also open code memcg_cache_name because it is called only from
kmem_cache_dup which frees the returned name right after
kmem_cache_create_memcg makes a copy of it. Such a short-lived
allocation doesn't make too much sense. So replace it by a static
buffer as kmem_cache_dup is called with memcg_cache_mutex.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 53b8201..3a75f2c 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3214,52 +3214,54 @@ void mem_cgroup_destroy_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
schedule_work(&cachep->memcg_params->destroy);
}
-static char *memcg_cache_name(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct kmem_cache *s)
-{
- char *name;
- struct dentry *dentry;
-
- rcu_read_lock();
- dentry = rcu_dereference(memcg->css.cgroup->dentry);
- rcu_read_unlock();
-
- BUG_ON(dentry == NULL);
-
- name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s(%d:%s)", s->name,
- memcg_cache_id(memcg), dentry->d_name.name);
-
- return name;
-}
+/*
+ * This lock protects updaters, not readers. We want readers to be as fast as
+ * they can, and they will either see NULL or a valid cache value. Our model
+ * allow them to see NULL, in which case the root memcg will be selected.
+ *
+ * We need this lock because multiple allocations to the same cache from a non
+ * will span more than one worker. Only one of them can create the cache.
+ */
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(memcg_cache_mutex);
+/*
+ * Called with memcg_cache_mutex held
+ */
static struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache_dup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
struct kmem_cache *s)
{
- char *name;
struct kmem_cache *new;
+ static char *tmp_name = NULL;
- name = memcg_cache_name(memcg, s);
- if (!name)
- return NULL;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&memcg_cache_mutex);
+
+ /*
+ * kmem_cache_create_memcg duplicates the given name and
+ * cgroup_name for this name requires RCU context.
+ * This static temporary buffer is used to prevent from
+ * pointless shortliving allocation.
+ */
+ if (!tmp_name) {
+ tmp_name = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!tmp_name);
+ if (!tmp_name)
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ snprintf(tmp_name, PAGE_SIZE, "%s(%d:%s)", s->name,
+ memcg_cache_id(memcg), cgroup_name(memcg->css.cgroup));
+ rcu_read_unlock();
- new = kmem_cache_create_memcg(memcg, name, s->object_size, s->align,
+ new = kmem_cache_create_memcg(memcg, tmp_name, s->object_size, s->align,
(s->flags & ~SLAB_PANIC), s->ctor, s);
if (new)
new->allocflags |= __GFP_KMEMCG;
- kfree(name);
return new;
}
-/*
- * This lock protects updaters, not readers. We want readers to be as fast as
- * they can, and they will either see NULL or a valid cache value. Our model
- * allow them to see NULL, in which case the root memcg will be selected.
- *
- * We need this lock because multiple allocations to the same cache from a non
- * will span more than one worker. Only one of them can create the cache.
- */
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(memcg_cache_mutex);
static struct kmem_cache *memcg_create_kmem_cache(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
struct kmem_cache *cachep)
{
--
1.7.10.4
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-25 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-21 1:22 [PATCH] memcg: fix memcg_cache_name() to use cgroup_name() Li Zefan
2013-03-21 9:08 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <20130321090849.GF6094-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-21 10:22 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-22 1:22 ` Li Zefan
[not found] ` <514BB23E.70908-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-22 8:07 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <20130322080749.GB31457-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-22 8:17 ` Li Zefan
[not found] ` <514C1388.6090909-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-22 8:22 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-22 9:31 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-22 9:41 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <514C2754.4080701-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-22 9:48 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <20130322094832.GG31457-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-22 10:03 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-22 10:06 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <20130322100609.GI31457-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-22 10:25 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <514C3193.9010609-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-22 10:56 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-24 7:34 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-25 8:20 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-24 7:33 ` Li Zefan
[not found] ` <514EAC41.5050700-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-25 9:06 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
[not found] ` <20130325090629.GN2154-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-26 7:52 ` Li Zefan
[not found] ` <515153C0.5070908-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-26 8:10 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-26 8:35 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <51515DEE.70105-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-26 8:43 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <20130326084348.GJ2295-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-26 9:02 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <51516410.2000007-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-27 1:15 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-27 8:37 ` Michal Hocko
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-27 8:36 Michal Hocko
2013-03-27 14:58 ` Johannes Weiner
[not found] ` <20130327145727.GD29052-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-27 15:11 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <20130327151104.GK16579-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-27 15:19 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-27 15:32 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <20130327153220.GL16579-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-27 17:32 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <20130327173223.GQ16579-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-28 7:48 ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-02 8:26 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <20130402082648.GB24345-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-03 21:33 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-04 7:06 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-27 15:32 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-27 15:47 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <1364373399-17397-1-git-send-email-mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-27 16:15 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-27 16:19 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <20130327161905.GN16579-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-27 16:21 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <CAOS58YPsrZNU9qDeMgJG3-Hkn0cBaigz16eTS5M57G95E8fxUQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-27 16:27 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-28 7:22 ` Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130325090629.GN2154@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko-alswssmvlrq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox